Cited by 39Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesPersonality Disorders and PsychopathologyPsychiatric care and mental health services

The collaborative assessment and management of suicidality (CAMS) versus enhanced care as usual (E-CAU) with suicidal soldiers: Moderator analyses from a randomized controlled trial

Huh, David, Jobes, David A., Comtois, Katherine Anne, Kerbrat, Amanda H., Chalker, Samantha A., Gutierrez, Peter M., Jennings, Keith W.·2018·Military Psychology

Abstract

Given historically high rates of suicide among military personnel over the past decade the present study analyzed whether key demographic, military, and research-based variables moderated clinical treatment outcomes of 148 suicidal active duty US Army soldiers. This is a secondary analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial comparing the collaborative assessment and management of suicidality (CAMS) to enhanced care as usual (E-CAU; Jobes et al., 2017). Nine potential moderator variables were derived from the suicidology literature, military-specific considerations, and previous CAMS research; these were sex, age, marital status, race, lifetime suicide attempts, combat deployments, time in service, initial distress, and borderline personality disorder diagnosis. The clinical outcomes included six suicide- and mental health-related variables. Six of the eight significant moderator findings in this study showed CAMS outperforming E-CAU in certain subgroups with medium to large effect sizes ranging from 0.48 to 1.50. Collectively, the results suggest that CAMS was associated with the greatest improvement among lower complexity soldier patients, particularly those with lower initial distress and fewer deployments. Those who were married or older generally responded better to CAMS, although the results were not entirely consistent with respect to age. CAMS’s effectiveness for married soldiers and those with lower initial distress was a particularly robust finding that persisted when adjusting more stringently for multiple testing. This study sheds light on several factors associated with the success of CAMS among suicidal soldiers that can assist in matching the treatment to those that may benefit the most.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08995605.2018.1503001

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the Operation Worth Living RCT, married Soldiers who received CAMS had significantly more resiliency and significantly less symptom distress than Soldiers in E-CAU.

    “For example, married Soldiers who received CAMS had significantly more resiliency and significantly less symptom distress than Soldiers in E-CAU.”
  • In a secondary analysis of possible moderators in the Operation Worth Living RCT, CAMS was found to be superior to E-CAU on six of eight significant moderator findings.

    “Within a secondary analysis of possible moderators, CAMS was found to be superior to E-CAU on six of eight significant moderator findings (25).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 39 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huh, D., Jobes, D. A., Comtois, K. A., Kerbrat, A. H., Chalker, S. A., Gutierrez, P. M., & Jennings, K. W.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Catholic University of America (US)
  • University of Colorado Anschutz (US)
Corresponding author
Huh, David
Venue
Military Psychology
Published
2018-08-21
Volume
30
Issue
6
Pages
495-506
ISSN
  • 0899-5605 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7876
OpenAlex
W2890637981
Cited by
37
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2
FWCI
7.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Military Psychology (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Department of the Army (W81XWH-11-1-0164)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality, suicidality, military personnel, suicide prevention, moderators, treatment response, borderline personality disorder, combat deployment, marital status, suicide attempts, United States Army

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review