Cited by 49Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesDigital Mental Health InterventionsEmergency and Acute Care Studies

A novel engagement of suicidality in the emergency department: Virtual Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality

Dimeff, Linda A., Jobes, David A., Chalker, Samantha A., Piehl, Brian M., Duvivier, Leticia Lobo, Lok, Benjamin C., Zalake, Mohan S., Chung, Julie +1 more·2020·General Hospital Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective A novel avatar system (Virtual Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality System; V-CAMS) for suicidal patients and medical personnel in emergency departments (EDs) was developed and evaluated. V-CAMS facilitates the delivery of CAMS and other evidence-based interventions to reduce unnecessary hospitalization, readmissions, and suicide following an ED visit.Method Using iterative user-centered design with 24 suicidal patients, an avatar prototype, "Dr. Dave" (based on Dr. Jobes) was created, along with other patient-facing tools; provider-facing tools, including a clinical decision support tool were also designed and tested to aid discharge disposition.Results Feasibility tests supported proof of concept. Suicidal patients affirmed the system's overall merit, positive Perception of Care, and acceptability; medical providers (n = 21) viewed the system as an efficient, effective, and safe method of improving care for suicidal ED patients and reducing unnecessary hospitalization.Conclusions Technology tools including a patient-facing avatar and e-caring contacts, along with provider-facing tools may offer a powerful method of facilitating best-practice suicide prevention interventions and point-of-care tools for suicidal patients seeking ED services and their medical providers. Future directions include full development of V-CAMS and integration into a health electronic medical record and a rigorous randomized controlled trial to study its effectiveness.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2018.05.005

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Users in 2 studies suggested that better integration of the agent with electronic health record systems or health care providers would be useful.

    “Additionally, users in 2 studies suggested that better integration of the agent with electronic health record (EHR) systems (for a virtual doctor [42]) or health care providers (for an asthma self-management chatbot [48]) would be useful.”
  • Users in 4 studies reported liking that the agent had a personality and/or showed empathy, whereas users in other studies reported disliking the lack of personal connection or had difficulty empathizing with the agent or reported disliking its limited conversation and responses.

    “Similarly, users in 4 studies reported liking that the agent had a personality and/or showed empathy [13,32,34,42], whereas users in other studies reported disliking the lack of personal connection or had difficulty in empathizing with the agent [35,37,50] or reported disliking its limited conversation and responses [35,56].”

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dimeff, L. A., Jobes, D. A., Chalker, S. A., Piehl, B. M., Duvivier, L. L., Lok, B. C., Zalake, M. S., Chung, J., & Koerner, K.
Affiliations
  • Catholic University of America (US)
  • Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System (US)
  • University of Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Dimeff, Linda A.
Venue
General Hospital Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-03
Volume
63
Pages
119-126
ISSN
0163-8343 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2804380175
Cited by
49
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2
FWCI
5.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • General Hospital Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (1 R43 MH108222-01A1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
Keywords
suicidality, emergency department, avatars, suicide prevention, Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality, clinical decision support, discharge disposition, unnecessary hospitalization, hospital readmission, point-of-care devices, user-centered design, acceptability, perceptions of care
MeSH terms
Proof of Concept Study, Suicide Prevention, Adolescent, Adult, Attitude of Health Personnel, Decision Support Techniques, Emergency Service, Hospital, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Inpatients, Male, Medical Informatics Applications, Middle Aged, Outpatients, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, User-Computer Interface, Process Assessment, Health Care, Point-of-Care Systems, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review