Cited by 20Disability Education and EmploymentBehavioral and Psychological StudiesCollaborative Teaching and Inclusion

Student Perspectives on Academic Accommodations

Baker, Diana, Scanlon, David·2016·Exceptionality

Abstract

The active involvement of secondary school students with high-incidence disabilities (HI) in instructional accommodations is essential to both enacting the accommodations and to the accommodations effectiveness. Very little is known about students with HI’s knowledge about instructional accommodations, experiences with them, or opinions on effective practices. A focus group study was conducted with 10 high school students with HI. A content analysis (Fraenkel & Wallen, 2009) revealed they are unaware of how their accommodations are identified, and that they typically are not directly taught to use them. The students explained how accommodations are usually provided in the classroom, including the ways they signal need, and offered their suggestions for more effective practices, which included responding to fairness and potential embarrassment. Their comments also revealed their beliefs and practices for self-advocating for accommodations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09362835.2015.1064411

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baker, D., & Scanlon, D.
Affiliations
  • Hobart and William Smith Colleges (US)
  • Boston College (US)
Corresponding author
Baker, Diana
Venue
Exceptionality
Published
2016-03-03
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
93-108
ISSN
  • 0936-2835 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7035
OpenAlex
W2318795663
Cited by
20
References
56
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Exceptionality (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion
Keywords
academic accommodations, high-incidence disabilities, high school students, student perceptions, self-advocacy, fairness, embarrassment, special education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review