The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Jaynes-Cummings Model
Abstract
The Jaynes-Cummings model (JCM), a soluble fully quantum mechanical model of an atom in a field, was first used (in 1963) to examine the classical aspects of spontaneous emission and to reveal the existence of Rabi oscillations in atomic excitation probabilities for fields with sharply defined energy (or photon number). For fields having a statistical distributions of photon numbers the oscillations collapse to an expected steady value. In 1980 it was discovered that with appropriate initial conditions (e.g. a near-classical field), the Rabi oscillations would eventually revive, only to collapse and revive repeatedly in a complicated pattern. The existence of these revivals, present in the analytic solutions of the JCM, provided direct evidence for discreteness of field excitation (photons) and hence for the truly quantum nature of radiation. Subsequent study revealed further non-classical properties of the JCM field, such as a tendency of the photons to antibunch. Within the last two years it has been found that during the quiescent intervals of collapsed Rabi oscillations the atom and field exist in a macroscopic superposition state (a Schrödinger cat). This discovery offers the opportunity to use the JCM to elucidate the basic properties of quantum correlation (entanglement) and to explore still further the relationship between classical and quantum physics. The relative simplicity of the JCM and the ease with which it can be extended through analytic expressions or numerical computation continues to motivate attention, as evidenced by the growing abundance of publications. We here present an overview of the theory of the JCM and some of the many extensions and generalizations that have appeared.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Atom—Photon Interactions: Basic Process and Appilcations
Cohen‐Tannoudji, C., Dupont‐Roc, J., & Grynberg, G. (1998) · doi:10.1002/9783527617197 · Cited by 2,510
Exact Solution for an N -Molecule—Radiation-Field Hamiltonian
Tavis, M., & Cummings, F. W. (1968) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.170.379 · Cited by 1,568
Cited by
Quantum dynamics of single trapped ions
Leibfried, D., Blatt, R., Monroe, C., & Wineland, D. (2003) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.75.281 · Cited by 2,739
The quantum-jump approach to dissipative dynamics in quantum optics
Plenio, M. B., & Knight, P. L. (1998) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.70.101 · Cited by 1,515
Self-citationMethods in Theoretical Quantum Optics
Barnett, S. M., & Radmore, P. M. (2002) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198563617.001.0001 · Cited by 1,211
Generation of Nonclassical Motional States of a Trapped Atom
Meekhof, D. M., Monroe, C., King, B. E., Itano, W. M., & Wineland, D. J. (1996) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.76.1796 · Cited by 1,135
Security against individual attacks for realistic quantum key distribution
Lütkenhaus, N. (2000) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.61.052304 · Cited by 747
Metadata
- Authors
- Shore, B. W., & Knight, P. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Modern Optics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1993-07
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1195-1238
- ISSN
- 0950-0340 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-3044
- OpenAlex
- W2134000508
- Cited by
- 1,361
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 17.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Jaynes-Cummings Model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/09500349314551321
- The paper
- Shore, B. W., & Knight, P. L. (1993). The Jaynes-Cummings Model. Journal of Modern Optics. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500349314551321
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.