Cited by 53Science Education and PedagogyHigher Education and EmployabilityEducational Methods and Analysis

Perceptions of science graduating students on their learning gains

Varsavsky, Cristina, Matthews, Kelly E., Hodgson, Yvonne·2014·International Journal of Science Education

Abstract

In this study, the Science Student Skills Inventory was used to gain understanding of student perceptions about their science skills set developed throughout their programme (scientific content knowledge, communication, scientific writing, teamwork, quantitative skills, and ethical thinking). The study involved 400 responses from undergraduate science students about to graduate from two Australian research-intensive institutions. For each skill, students rated on a four-point Likert scale their perception of the importance of developing the skill within the programme, how much they improved it throughout their undergraduate science programme, how much they saw the skill included in the programme, how confident they were about the skill, and how much they will use the skill in the future. Descriptive statistics indicate that overall, student perception of importance of these skills was greater than perceptions of improvement, inclusion in the programme, confidence, and future use. Quantitative skills and ethical thinking were perceived by more students to be less important. t-Test analyses revealed some differences in perception across different demographic groups (gender, age, graduate plans, and research experience). Most notably, gender showed significant differences across most skills. Implications for curriculum development are discussed, and lines for further research are given.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09500693.2013.830795

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Varsavsky, C., Matthews, K. E., & Hodgson, Y.
Affiliations
  • Monash University (AU)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Varsavsky, Cristina
Venue
International Journal of Science Education
Published
2013-08-21
Volume
36
Issue
6
Pages
929-951
ISSN
  • 0950-0693 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5289
OpenAlex
W2039473022
Cited by
53
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
FWCI
20.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Science Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education and Employability
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Methods and Analysis
Keywords
undergraduate science education, student perceptions, learning gains, science skills, scientific writing, teamwork, quantitative skills, ethical thinking, gender differences, research experience, curriculum development, research universities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review