Cited by 157Science Education and PedagogyInnovative Teaching MethodsHigher Education Research Studies

Transforming Science Education at Large Research Universities: A Case Study in Progressxs

Wieman, Carl, Perkins, Katherine, Gilbert, Sarah·2010·Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning

Abstract

There are countless reports stressing the economic and societal benefits to be gained from improved science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) education for all students. But although there ...

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00091380903563035

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wieman, C., Perkins, K., & Gilbert, S.
Affiliations
University of British Columbia (CA)
Venue
Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning
Published
2010-02-26
Volume
42
Issue
2
Pages
6-14
ISSN
  • 0009-1383 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-9146
OpenAlex
W1975486664
Cited by
157
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 5
FWCI
34.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Change The Magazine of Higher Learning (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
Keywords
science education reform, large research universities, STEM education, undergraduate science curriculum, higher education transformation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review