Teacher discursive moves: conceptualising a schema of dialogic discourse in science classrooms
Abstract
This research investigates various purposes of teacher discourse moves essential to orchestrate dialogic discourse in secondary science classrooms. Data collected includes classroom observations and teacher interviews of two teachers teaching in an Indian school setting, whose classroom practices subscribed to a dialogic framework. A discursive move framework was developed, using a grounded, interpretative approach, to analyse teacher moves and their purposes at the utterance level. Iterative examination of the data led to the emergence of overarching goals being pursued for dialogic organisation of talk. These goals are conceptualised as three components of a schema characterising dialogic discourse in science classrooms: Foundation (F) aimed at developing a culture of discourse; Initiation (I) moves working towards sparking students’ multiple perspectives; and Perpetuation (P) moves, which engage students in active exchange of ideas. Through axial coding, it emerged that teacher utterances, as detailed in the discursive framework, enabled the three components to come into play in dialogic classrooms. Specific tools used by the two teachers have been identified. A repertoire of tools facilitating teachers to position themselves as ‘enablers of talk for thinking’ [Chin, C. (2006). Classroom interaction in science: teacher questioning and feedback to students’ responses. International Journal of Science Education, 28(11), 1315–1346.] has been identified.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Effective teacher moves foster deeper engagement and disciplinary understanding.
“Prior studies have shown that effective teacher moves foster deeper engagement and disciplinary understanding (e.g., Bansal 2018; Yıldız-Feyzioğlu and Türksever-Güleç 2024).”
From Metadiscourse and Teacher Moves for Supporting Student Reasoning in Linguistics Classroom Interactions (2026) · cites this paper as Bansal 2018
Cites
Basics of Qualitative Research (3rd ed.): Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008) · SAGE · doi:10.4135/9781452230153 · Cited by 12,136 · see citing works
Classroom Interaction in Science: Teacher questioning and feedback to students’ responses
Chin, C. (2006) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500690600621100 · Cited by 566 · cited 8× · see citing works
“One of the major obstacles to the organisation of dialogic discourse in classrooms as reported in research is teachers’ ignorance about the nature of moves they routinely employ in organising the discourse patterns (Chin, 2006).”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
VIVID: Human-AI Collaborative Authoring of Vicarious Dialogues from Lecture Videos
Choi, S., Lee, H., Lee, Y., & Kim, J. (2024) · Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642867 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Soysal, Y. (2022) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-021-00266-3 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Tao, Y., Wang, D., & Chen, G. (2026) · British Educational Research Journal · doi:10.1002/berj.70031 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Li, J., & Hu, W. (2026) · International Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1111/ijal.12793 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bansal, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Delhi (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Bansal, Garima
- ORCID
- Bansal, Garima
- Venue
- International Journal of Science Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2018-09-10
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 1891-1912
- ISSN
- 0950-0693 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-5289
- OpenAlex
- W2890860892
- Cited by
- 65
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7
- FWCI
- 21.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Science Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Keywords
- dialogic discourse, science classroom, secondary science teaching, classroom discourse, teacher questioning, teacher utterances, student perceptions, classroom interaction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review