Cited by 65Science Education and PedagogyInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsStudent Assessment and Feedback

Teacher discursive moves: conceptualising a schema of dialogic discourse in science classrooms

Bansal, Garima·2018·International Journal of Science Education

Abstract

This research investigates various purposes of teacher discourse moves essential to orchestrate dialogic discourse in secondary science classrooms. Data collected includes classroom observations and teacher interviews of two teachers teaching in an Indian school setting, whose classroom practices subscribed to a dialogic framework. A discursive move framework was developed, using a grounded, interpretative approach, to analyse teacher moves and their purposes at the utterance level. Iterative examination of the data led to the emergence of overarching goals being pursued for dialogic organisation of talk. These goals are conceptualised as three components of a schema characterising dialogic discourse in science classrooms: Foundation (F) aimed at developing a culture of discourse; Initiation (I) moves working towards sparking students’ multiple perspectives; and Perpetuation (P) moves, which engage students in active exchange of ideas. Through axial coding, it emerged that teacher utterances, as detailed in the discursive framework, enabled the three components to come into play in dialogic classrooms. Specific tools used by the two teachers have been identified. A repertoire of tools facilitating teachers to position themselves as ‘enablers of talk for thinking’ [Chin, C. (2006). Classroom interaction in science: teacher questioning and feedback to students’ responses. International Journal of Science Education, 28(11), 1315–1346.] has been identified.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09500693.2018.1514543

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bansal, G.
Affiliations
University of Delhi (IN)
Corresponding author
Bansal, Garima
Venue
International Journal of Science Education
Published
2018-09-10
Volume
40
Issue
15
Pages
1891-1912
ISSN
  • 0950-0693 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5289
OpenAlex
W2890860892
Cited by
65
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7
FWCI
21.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Science Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
Keywords
dialogic discourse, science classroom, secondary science teaching, classroom discourse, teacher questioning, teacher utterances, student perceptions, classroom interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review