The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen: Examining an endarkened feminist epistemology in educational research and leadership
Abstract
This article explores the cultural genesis and meanings of the lives of three African-American women leaders/researchers and disrupts and unsettles the taken-for-granted notions surrounding the very goals and purposes of educational research. By examining the life notes of these women, the author develops an endarkened feminist epistemology, which embodies a distinguishably different cultural standpoint, located in the intersection/overlap of the culturally constructed socializations of race, gender, and other identities and the historical and contemporary contexts of oppressions and resistance for African-American women.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment.
Brewer, R. M., & Collins, P. H. (1992) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2074808 · Cited by 19,445
Race and Essentialism in Feminist Legal Theory
Harris, A. P. (1990) · Stanford Law Review · doi:10.2307/1228886 · Cited by 740 · cited 3×
“Whether concerns over research legitimacy, tenure and promotion, publication, or professional acceptability, asymmetrical power relations, particularly as they influence the work of women in the academy, have been well studied and articulated (see Bannerji, 1991; Fine, 1992; Harding, 1987; Harris, 1990; James & Farmer…”
Background
Cited by
Race, Culture, and Researcher Positionality: Working Through Dangers Seen, Unseen, and Unforeseen
Milner, H. R. (2007) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x07309471 · Cited by 1,714
Bernal, D. D. (2002) · Qualitative Inquiry · doi:10.1177/107780040200800107 · Cited by 1,524
Validity in qualitative research revisited
Cho, J., & Trent, A. (2006) · Qualitative Research · doi:10.1177/1468794106065006 · Cited by 1,037
Philosophy in mixed methods teaching: The transformative paradigm as illustration
Mertens, D. M. (2010) · International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches · doi:10.5172/mra.2010.4.1.009 · Cited by 190
Morris, J. E. (2004) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/00028312041001069 · Cited by 141
Metadata
- Authors
- Dillard, C. B.
- Venue
- International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2000-11
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 661-681
- ISSN
- 0951-8398 (ISSN-L)
- 1366-5898
- OpenAlex
- W2001133729
- Cited by
- 560
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 15.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen: Examining an endarkened feminist epistemology in educational research and leadership. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/09518390050211565
- The paper
- Dillard, C. B. (2000). The substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen: Examining an endarkened feminist epistemology in educational research and leadership. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390050211565
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
