Cited by 262Critical Race Theory in EducationRacial and Ethnic Identity ResearchHigher Education Research Studies

‘You make me wanna holler and throw up both my hands!’: campus culture, Black misandric microaggressions, and racial battle fatigue

Smith, William A., Mustaffa, Jalil Bishop, Jones, Chantal M., Curry, Tommy J., Allen, Walter R.·2016·International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education

Abstract

Black males are scarce on White campuses. Still, they experience hypervisibility and are targets of hypersurveillance. This study used focus groups and semi-structured interviews to examine the experiences of 36 Black male students attending seven ‘elite’ historically White Research I institutions. Two themes emerged: (a) anti-Black male stereotyping and marginality and (b) hypersurveillance and control directed at Black men by Whites. Participants reported stereotyping and increased surveillance by police on and off campus. They also reported being defined as ‘out of place’ and ‘fitting the description’ of illegitimate members of the campus community. As a result, students reported psychological stress responses symptomatic of racial battle fatigue (e.g. frustration, shock, anger, disappointment, resentment, anxiety, helplessness, hopelessness, and fear). The study finds the college environment was more hostile toward Black men than other groups, exemplifying Black racial misandry.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09518398.2016.1214296

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • At PWIs, Black students may report more discrimination, more hostile campus climates, and less institutional support than HBCU peers.

    “at PWIs, Black students may be more likely to report discriminatory experiences, perceive more hostile campus climates, and endorse lower feelings of support from their institution, relative to their HBCU peers (e.g., Campbell et al., 2019; Smith et al., 2016).”
  • Black students were subjected to hostile environments in their universities, describing psychological stress and symptoms of racial battle fatigue.

    “Black students, in a study by Smith et al. (2016), shared that they were subjected to hostile environments in their universities, describing psychological stress and symptoms of racial battle fatigue.”

    From Black Students’ Experiences of Anti-Black Racism on Campus (2025) · cites this paper as Smith et al., 2016

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smith, W. A., Mustaffa, J. B., Jones, C. M., Curry, T. J., & Allen, W. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Utah (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Texas A&M University (US)
Corresponding author
Smith, William A.
Venue
International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education
Published
2016-09-14
Volume
29
Issue
9
Pages
1189-1209
ISSN
  • 0951-8398 (ISSN-L)
  • 1366-5898
OpenAlex
W2520225917
Cited by
262
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1
FWCI
47.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Race Theory in Education
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
Keywords
Black male students, racial battle fatigue, campus culture, marginality, police surveillance, psychological stress, historically white institutions, racial microaggressions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review