Cited by 134Online and Blended LearningEnglish Language Learning and TeachingTechnology-Enhanced Education Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Chinese graduate students' experiences and attitudes toward online learning

Thompson *, Ling, Ku, Heng‐Yu·2005·Educational Media International

Abstract

This qualitative study was conducted to explore seven Chinese graduate students’ experiences of and attitudes to taking online courses in the USA. All seven participants indicated that online learning was an interesting experience for them, however, they had mixed attitudes toward this unfamiliar mode of learning. The participants pointed out that easy resource sharing, easy record keeping and convenience of the discussion board were features of online learning that they liked the most. On the other hand, their writing skills in English, insufficient and deferred feedback and the lack of cultural exchange were their major concerns regarding online learning. Recommendations were provided for Chinese students on how to prepare for and how to succeed in online courses. Online instructors were also given recommendations regarding how to integrate teaching strategies to promote diversity and cultural understanding. Les étudiants de deuxième cycle chinois: leurs expériences et attitudes vis à vis de l’apprentissage en ligne On a mené cette étude qualitative pour analyser les expériences et les attitudes de sept étudiants de deuxième cycle chinois qui suivaient des cours en ligne aux Etats Unis. Les sept participants ont tous indiqué que l’apprentissage en ligne était quelque chose d’intéressant pour eux mais qu’ils avaient une attitude réservée par rapport à cette forme d’apprentissage peu familière. Ces participants ont noté que la facilité de partage des ressources, et de l’archi…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09523980500116878

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 31 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Bannon B, 1997, Web‐based instruction
  2. Bleed R, 2001, Educause Review, 16
  3. Hofstede GH, 2001, Culture’s consequences: comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations
  4. Imel S, 1996, Learning in groups: new directions for adult and continuing education
  5. Kluckhohn C, 1951, The policy sciences
  6. McLoughlin C, 1999, Teaching in the disciplines, learning in context
  7. Schrum L, 1998, Adult learning and the internet: New directions for adult and continuing education, No 78
  8. Tiene D, 2000, Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 9, 371

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Thompson *, L., & Ku, H.
Venue
Educational Media International
Published
2005-03
Volume
42
Issue
1
Pages
33-47
ISSN
  • 0952-3987 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-5790
OpenAlex
W1963909979
Cited by
134
References
31
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 5
FWCI
9.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Educational Media International (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › English Language Learning and Teaching
  • Social Sciences › Education › Technology-Enhanced Education Studies
Keywords
online learning, Chinese graduate students, international students, student attitudes, student experience, English writing skills, delayed feedback, cultural exchange, online forums, resource sharing, online teaching strategies, cultural diversity in teaching, American universities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review