Production efficiency improvement in batch production system using value stream mapping and simulation: a case study of the roasted and ground coffee industry
Abstract
This article involves the use of value stream mapping (VSM) and simulation to improve the efficiency of the batch production system commonly found in small and medium enterprises. VSM is a tool for portraying the system to identify areas for improvement. The simulation model imitates a real production system so that improvement alternatives can be evaluated without disrupting actual production. The simulation can also optimise the levels of resources required for the bottleneck operations. The production process at a roasted and ground coffee plant that had serious capacity shortage problem is used as a case study. Three improvement alternatives are evaluated: (1) increasing the workforce at the bottleneck operations; (2) using a new workforce management plan formulated from analysing the VSM and simulation and (3) investing in a machine to replace the bottleneck manual operations. Analysis results show the capability of these tools to formulate effective solutions for the case study system.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In coffee production in Thailand, applying Kanban reduced the number of operators by 13% in exclusive material transport activities.
“Un caso de aplicación es el de la producción de café en Tailandia donde se redujo el número de operarios en un 13% en las actividades exclusivas de transporte de materiales. 45”
From Marco de Referencia de la Aplicación de Manufactura Esbelta en la Industria (2017) · cites this paper as [45]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
El-Khalil, R. (2022) · International Journal of Lean Six Sigma · doi:10.1108/ijlss-10-2017-0118 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Marco de Referencia de la Aplicación de Manufactura Esbelta en la Industria
Tapia Coronado, J., Escobedo Portillo, T., Barrón López, E., Martínez Moreno, G., & Estebané Ortega, V. (2017) · Ciencia & trabajo · doi:10.4067/s0718-24492017000300171 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
- Authors
- Parthanadee, P., & Buddhakulsomsiri, J.
- Affiliations
- Kasetsart University (TH)
- Thammasat University (TH)
- Corresponding author
- Parthanadee, Parthana
- Venue
- Production Planning & Control
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2012-07-16
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 425-446
- ISSN
- 0953-7287 (ISSN-L)
- 1366-5871
- OpenAlex
- W2009717707
- Cited by
- 61
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 5.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Production Planning & Control (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Management and Optimization Techniques
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Operations Management Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Simulation and Modeling Applications
- Keywords
- value stream mapping, manufacturing simulation, batch production, production efficiency, bottleneck operations, capacity shortage, workforce management, small and medium-sized enterprises, workforce expansion, equipment investment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review