The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Sociology of Expectations:Retrospecting Prospects and Prospecting Retrospects
Abstract
Future expectations and promises are crucial to providing the dynamism and momentum upon which so many ventures in science and technology depend. This is especially the case for pre-market applications where practical utility and value has yet to be demonstrated and where investment must be mobilised. For instance, clinical biotechnology (including a wide range of genetic therapeutic and engineering applications) has been at the centre of ferocious debates about whether or not promises and expectations will be realized. In some cases, the failure of expectations has severely damaged the reputation and credibility of professions, institutions and industry. The need for a better analytical understanding of the dynamics of expectations in innovation is both necessary and timely. This paper develops the basis for a sociology of expectations, drawing on recent writing within Science and Technology Studies (STS) and case studies of biotechnology innovation. In particular, we offer a model for understanding how expectations will predictably vary according to some key parameters. Such factors include the degree to which technologies and innovation relationships are either relatively established or newly emergent. Expectations will also vary according actors' relative closeness and involvement in knowledge production itself. The paper proceeds by analyzing the way expectations in clinical biotechnology have changed over time. That is, we compare the way the future was once represented with the way it has been represented more recently. The paper concludes by offering a means by which it is possible to map or model the "situatedness of expectations'.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1994) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.31-4888 · Cited by 9,294
(1987) · Cited by 8,955
Callon, M. (1984) · The Sociological Review · doi:10.1111/j.1467-954x.1984.tb00113.x · Cited by 7,763
Opening Pandora's Box: A Sociological Analysis of Scientists' Discourse.
Gieryn, T. F., Gilbert, G. N., & Mulkay, M. (1985) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2070471 · Cited by 1,580
Misunderstanding Science?: The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology
(1996) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511563737 · Cited by 1,342
Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice
Star, S. L., & Collins, H. M. (1988) · Technology and Culture · doi:10.2307/3105095 · Cited by 1,280
When Old Technologies Were New: Thinking about Electric Communication in the Late Nineteenth Century
Millard, A., & Marvin, C. (1989) · The American Historical Review · doi:10.2307/1873772 · Cited by 848
The “ideograph”: A link between rhetoric and ideology
McGee, M. C. (1980) · Quarterly Journal of Speech · doi:10.1080/00335638009383499 · Cited by 827
Inventing accuracy: an historical sociology of nuclear missile guidance
(1991) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.29-0924 · Cited by 745
Adam, B. (1990) · ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) · Cited by 682
Cited by
Developing a framework for responsible innovation
Stilgoe, J., Owen, R., & Macnaghten, P. (2013) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008 · Cited by 3,184
An agenda for sustainability transitions research: State of the art and future directions
Köhler, J., Geels, F. W., Kern, F., Markard, J., Onsongo, E., Wieczorek, A., Alkemade, F., Avelino, F., Bergek, A., Boons, F., et al. (2019) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.004 · Cited by 2,800
The sociology of expectations in science and technology
Borup, M., Brown, N., Konrad, K., & Van Lente, H. (2006) · Technology Analysis & Strategic Management · doi:10.1080/09537320600777002 · Cited by 1,902
Self-citationEntrepreneurial Storytelling, Future Expectations, and the Paradox of Legitimacy
Garud, R., Schildt, H. A., & Lant, T. K. (2014) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2014.0915 · Cited by 555
Making time for soil: Technoscientific futurity and the pace of care
Puig de la Bellacasa, M. (2015) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/0306312715599851 · Cited by 512
Metadata
- Authors
- Brown, N., & Michael, M.
- Venue
- Technology Analysis & Strategic Management
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2003-03
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-18
- ISSN
- 0953-7325 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-3990
- OpenAlex
- W2003188174
- Cited by
- 956
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 38.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Sociology of Expectations:Retrospecting Prospects and Prospecting Retrospects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/0953732032000046024
- The paper
- Brown, N., & Michael, M. (2003). A Sociology of Expectations:Retrospecting Prospects and Prospecting Retrospects. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/0953732032000046024
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.