The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Recurrent Neural Network that Learns to Count
Open accessAbstract
Parallel distributed processing (PDP) architectures demonstrate a potentially radical alternative to the traditional theories of language processing that are based on serial computational models. However, learning complex structural relationships in temporal data presents a serious challenge to PDP systems. For example, automata theory dictates that processing strings from a context-free language (CFL) requires a stack or counter memory device. While some PDP models have been hand-crafted to emulate such a device, it is not clear how a neural network might develop such a device when learning a CFL. This research employs standard backpropagation training techniques for a recurrent neural network (RNN) in the task of learning to predict the next character in a simple deterministic CFL (DCFL). We show that an RNN can learn to recognize the structure of a simple DCFL. We use dynamical systems theory to identify how network states reflect that structure by building counters in phase space. The work is an empirical investigation which is complementary to theoretical analyses of network capabilities, yet original in its specific configuration of dynamics involved. The application of dynamical systems theory helps us relate the simulation results to theoretical results, and the learning task enables us to highlight some issues for understanding dynamical systems that process language with counters.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Distributed representations, simple recurrent networks, and grammatical structure
Elman, J. L. (1991) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00114844 · Cited by 1,354
Self-citation
Cited by
Deep learning in neural networks: an overview
Schmidhuber, J. (2015) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2014.09.003 · Cited by 18,570
Deep Learning for Hyperspectral Image Classification: An Overview
Li, S., Song, W., Fang, L., Chen, Y., Ghamisi, P., & Benediktsson, J. A. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2019.2907932 · Cited by 2,007
Deep Learning for Anomaly Detection: A Survey
Chalapathy, R., & Chawla, S. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1901.03407 · Cited by 1,240
More than words: Frequency effects for multi-word phrases
Arnon, I., & Snider, N. (2010) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2009.09.005 · Cited by 791
LSTM recurrent networks learn simple context-free and context-sensitive languages
Gers, F. A., & Schmidhuber, E. (2001) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/72.963769 · Cited by 722
Metadata
- Authors
- RODRIGUEZ, P., WILES, J., & ELMAN, J. L.
- Venue
- Connection Science
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1999-03
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 5-40
- ISSN
- 0954-0091 (ISSN-L)
- 1360-0494
- OpenAlex
- W1972085588
- Cited by
- 241
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Recurrent Neural Network that Learns to Count. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/095400999116340
- The paper
- RODRIGUEZ, P., WILES, J., & ELMAN, J. L. (1999). A Recurrent Neural Network that Learns to Count. Connection Science. https://doi.org/10.1080/095400999116340
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.