Cited by 28HIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsHIV/AIDS Impact and ResponsesHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life

Cost analyses of peer health worker and mHealth support interventions for improving AIDS care in Rakai, Uganda

Open access
Chang, Larry W., Kagaayi, Joseph, Nakigozi, Gertrude, Serwada, David, Quinn, Thomas C., Gray, Ronald H., Bollinger, Robert C., Reynolds, Steven J. +1 more·2013·AIDS Care

Abstract

A cost analysis study calculates resources needed to deliver an intervention and can provide useful information on affordability for service providers and policy-makers. We conducted cost analyses of both a peer health worker (PHW) and a mHealth (mobile phone) support intervention. Excluding supervisory staffing costs, total yearly costs for the PHW intervention was $8475, resulting in a yearly cost per patient of $8.74, per virologic failure averted cost of $189, and per patient lost to follow-up averted cost of $1025. Including supervisory staffing costs increased total yearly costs to $14,991. Yearly costs of the mHealth intervention were an additional $1046, resulting in a yearly cost per patient of $2.35. In a threshold analysis, the PHW intervention was found to be cost saving if it was able to avert 1.50 patients per year from switching to second-line antiretroviral therapy. Other AIDS care programs may find these intervention costs affordable.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09540121.2012.722600

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is promise for m-Health interventions and increased use of mobile phone technology in Uganda in both rural and urban communities despite poverty levels.

    “In addition, there is promise for m-Health interventions and increased use of mobile phone technology in Uganda in both rural and urban communities despite the poverty levels.”

    From Barriers and opportunities to implementation of sustainable e-Health programmes in Uganda: A literature review (2017) · cites this paper as [44]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) says the mHealth support intervention would likely add minimal implementation costs, supporting its promise in the Rakai AIDS-care setting. The Methods describe phones used by peer health workers, but the paper does not establish increased mobile-phone use across both rural and urban Ugandan communities or assess use despite poverty levels. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Both the peer health worker and mHealth support interventions were found to be reasonable for the budgetary requirements of many AIDS care programs.

    “Both interventions were found to be reasonable for the budgetary requirements of many AIDS care programs.”

    From mHealth in Sub-Saharan Africa (2013) · cites this paper as [18]

  • Effectiveness in averting virologic failure and loss to follow-up was shown for the peer health worker intervention with the addition of mHealth.

    “The effectiveness in averting virologic failure and loss to follow-up were shown for the PHW intervention with the addition of mHealth; however, a comparison of effectiveness of PHWs with and without mHealth was not performed.”

    From mHealth in Sub-Saharan Africa (2013) · cites this paper as [18]

  • In Uganda, a cost analysis found costs per patient per year of $8.75 for a peer health worker program versus $2.35 for an mHealth support program.

    “A cost analysis by Chang showed costs per patient per year in Uganda of $8.75 for a peer health worker (PHW) program versus $2.35 for an mHealth support program [18].”

    From mHealth in Sub-Saharan Africa (2013) · cites this paper as [18]

  • A comparison of effectiveness of peer health workers with and without mHealth was not performed.

    “The effectiveness in averting virologic failure and loss to follow-up were shown for the PHW intervention with the addition of mHealth; however, a comparison of effectiveness of PHWs with and without mHealth was not performed.”

    From mHealth in Sub-Saharan Africa (2013) · cites this paper as [18]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chang, L. W., Kagaayi, J., Nakigozi, G., Serwada, D., Quinn, T. C., Gray, R. H., Bollinger, R. C., Reynolds, S. J., & Holtgrave, D.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Rakai Health Sciences Program (UG)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • d Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health , Baltimore , MD , USA
Corresponding author
Chang, Larry W.
Venue
AIDS Care
Published
2012-09-13
Volume
25
Issue
5
Pages
652-656
ISSN
  • 0954-0121 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0451
OpenAlex
W2023709198
Cited by
28
References
15
Citations by year
2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • AIDS Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Doris Duke Charitable Foundation
  • U.S. President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K23MH086338)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (2T32-AI07291, T32AI007291, ZIAAI000361)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › HIV/AIDS Impact and Responses
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Keywords
mobile health, HIV care, antiretroviral therapy, virological failure, loss to follow-up, second-line antiretroviral therapy, cost per patient, Rakai, Uganda
MeSH terms
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, Community Health Services, Costs and Cost Analysis, Humans, Patient Care Team, Quality of Health Care, Retrospective Studies, Uganda, Telemedicine, Cell Phone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review