Cited by 184Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsHIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsICT in Developing Communities

Impact of a mHealth Intervention for Peer Health Workers on AIDS Care in Rural Uganda: A Mixed Methods Evaluation of a Cluster-Randomized Trial

Open access
Chang, Larry W., Kagaayi, Joseph, Arem, Hannah, Nakigozi, Gertrude, Ssempijja, Victor, Serwadda, David, Quinn, Thomas C., Gray, Ronald H. +2 more·2011·AIDS and Behavior

Abstract

Mobile phone access in low and middle-income countries is rapidly expanding and offers an opportunity to leverage limited human resources for health. We conducted a mixed methods evaluation of a cluster-randomized trial exploratory substudy on the impact of a mHealth (mobile phone) support intervention used by community-based peer health workers (PHW) on AIDS care in rural Uganda. 29 PHWs at 10 clinics were randomized by clinic to receive the intervention or not. PHWs used phones to call and text higher level providers with patient-specific clinical information. 970 patients cared for by the PHWs were followed over a 26 month period. No significant differences were found in patients' risk of virologic failure. Qualitative analyses found improvements in patient care and logistics and broad support for the mHealth intervention among patients, clinic staff, and PHWs. Key challenges identified included variable patient phone access, privacy concerns, and phone maintenance.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10461-011-9995-x

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Health workers perceived direct communication with clients as improving care and trust, while still recognizing that some situations require face-to-face contact.

    “Mobile devices facilitated two‐way communication between all categories of health workers and clients (Chang 2011; Garg 2016; Hampshire 2016; Hirsch‐Moverman 2017), and kept health workers informed about the clients' conditions (Barnabee 2014; Huq 2014).”

    From Health workers' perceptions and experiences of using mHealth technologies to deliver primary healthcare services: a qualitative evidence synthesis (2020) · cites this paper as Chang 2011

    The Qualitative Results report that mobile phones improved communication between peer health workers and patients, and that voice calls expedited patient care. They also describe in-person conversations, but do not say that communication improved client trust or that health workers recognized particular situations requiring face-to-face contact. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The exchange broke the hierarchy between health worker categories, when previously unreachable professionals could more easily be reached.

    “The exchange broke the hierarchy between health worker categories, when previously unreachable professionals could more easily be reached (Chang 2011; Huq 2014; Khan 2015).”

    From Health workers' perceptions and experiences of using mHealth technologies to deliver primary healthcare services: a qualitative evidence synthesis (2020) · cites this paper as Chang 2011

    The Results (Qualitative Results; page unavailable) say phones made communication between peer health workers and clinic staff faster and improved their working relationships. They do not establish that the exchange broke a hierarchy between worker categories or that the professionals had previously been unreachable. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Health workers felt that health promotion and educational messaging directed at clients using mobile health interventions impacted positively on clients' health behaviours.

    “Health workers felt that health promotion and educational messaging directed at clients using mobile health interventions, impacted positively on clients' health behaviours”

    From Health workers' perceptions and experiences of using mHealth technologies to deliver primary healthcare services: a qualitative evidence synthesis (2020) · cites this paper as Chang 2011

    In Results > Qualitative Results, a peer health worker said that patients were motivated to take their medication because they knew phone messages reported adherence to clinic staff. This supports the reported perception of a positive effect on client behaviour, but the messages were reports to staff, not health-promotion or educational messages directed at clients. The Discussion also describes the adherence benefit as something only some participants felt occurred; page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In the Ugandan peer health worker trial, compared to voice calls, reservations about the lack of immediate response via SMS were noted, privacy concerns were raised, and phone maintenance and charging were problematic.

    “As compared to voice calls, reservations about the lack of immediate response via SMS were noted, privacy concerns were raised, and phone maintenance and charging were also problematic.”

    From Mobile Health (mHealth) Approaches and Lessons for Increased Performance and Retention of Community Health Workers in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Review (2013) · cites this paper as [34]

    The Discussion reports that voice calls were the main benefit of the phones and that shared-phone kiosks raised privacy concerns. The Qualitative Results describe phone-maintenance problems, especially charging where electricity was unavailable. The copy does not report reservations specifically about a lack of immediate response via SMS; it gives unclear benefits and difficulty monitoring messages as reasons for dropping the texting component. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In a randomized controlled trial delivering SMS to community-based peer health workers in rural Uganda supporting antiretroviral treatment for HIV patients, no virological differences in patient outcome over 26 months were observed.

    “A randomized controlled trial delivered SMS to community-based peer health workers in rural Uganda supporting antiretroviral treatment for HIV patients [34]. No virological differences in patient outcome over 26 months were observed, but limited qualitative data showed improvements in patient care, logistics, and broad support from health workers and patients.”

    From Mobile Health (mHealth) Approaches and Lessons for Increased Performance and Retention of Community Health Workers in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Review (2013) · cites this paper as [34]

    The Abstract reports that 970 patients were followed for 26 months and that there was no significant difference in virologic failure. But the Methods (Substudy Trial Description) say peer health workers were given phones and asked to send texts with patient data to a central database; the intervention was not simply SMS delivered to the workers. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 26 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [24]Reynolds SJ Kagaayi J Nakigozi G Makumbi F Opendi P Nakamya P Gray R Wawer M Quinn TC Lutalo T Serwadda D Early immunologic and virologic responses to ART in rural Rakai, Uganda [Abstract THPE0181] Toronto XVI International AIDS Conference 2006
  2. [28]Boguszewska S Communications markets in Uganda Cambridge Pyramid Research, Inc 2009

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chang, L. W., Kagaayi, J., Arem, H., Nakigozi, G., Ssempijja, V., Serwadda, D., Quinn, T. C., Gray, R. H., Bollinger, R. C., & Reynolds, S. J.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Rakai Health Sciences Program (UG)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Chang, Larry W.
Venue
AIDS and Behavior
Published
2011-07-08
Volume
15
Issue
8
Pages
1776-1784
ISSN
  • 1090-7165 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3254
OpenAlex
W2042543641
Cited by
184
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 10
FWCI
24.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • AIDS and Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Doris Duke Charitable Foundation
  • U.S. President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K23MH086338)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (2T32-AI07291, T32AI007291, ZIAAI000361)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R24HD042854)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › ICT in Developing Communities
Keywords
mobile health, HIV care, mobile telephony, community health workers, virological failure, rural health care, privacy concerns, health worker support, Uganda
MeSH terms
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, Communication, Community Health Services, Female, Health Personnel, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Peer Group, Rural Population, Uganda, Cluster Analysis, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Telemedicine, Anti-HIV Agents, Cell Phone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review