The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Women and science careers: leaky pipeline or gender filter?
Abstract
Women are under‐represented in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) majors and careers in most industrialized countries around the world. This paper explores the broad array of explanations for the absence of women in STEM put forth in the literature of the last 30 years. It is argued that some proposed explanations are without merit and are in fact dangerous, while others do play a part in a complex interaction of factors. It is suggested that the very nature of science may contribute to the removal of women from the ‘pipeline’. Recommendations for reform in science education to address this problem are also provided.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry
Longino, H. E. (1990) · doi:10.1515/9780691209753 · Cited by 3,092
The Biasing Influence of Pupil Sex in a Science Marking Exercise
Spear, M. G. (1984) · Research in Science & Technological Education · doi:10.1080/0263514840020107 · Cited by 50
Cited by
Why are some STEM fields more gender balanced than others?
Cheryan, S., Ziegler, S. A., Montoya, A. K., & Jiang, L. (2017) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000052 · Cited by 1,259
Wang, X. (2013) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/0002831213488622 · Cited by 896
Unequal effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on scientists
Myers, K. R., Tham, W. Y., Yin, Y., Cohodes, N., Thursby, J. G., Thursby, M. C., Schiffer, P., Walsh, J. T., Lakhani, K. R., & Wang, D. (2020) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-020-0921-y · Cited by 725
Stability and volatility of STEM career interest in high school: A gender study
Sadler, P. M., Sonnert, G., Hazari, Z., & Tai, R. (2012) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.21007 · Cited by 699
Godwin, A., Potvin, G., Hazari, Z., & Lock, R. (2016) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/jee.20118 · Cited by 574
Metadata
- Authors
- Clark Blickenstaff*, J.
- Venue
- Gender and Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-10
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 369-386
- ISSN
- 0954-0253 (ISSN-L)
- 1360-0516
- OpenAlex
- W2049015059
- Cited by
- 1,746
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 27.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Women and science careers: leaky pipeline or gender filter? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/09540250500145072
- The paper
- Clark Blickenstaff*, J. (2005). Women and science careers: leaky pipeline or gender filter? Gender and Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540250500145072
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.