Cited by 42Face Recognition and PerceptionEvolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorChild and Animal Learning Development

Predictive gaze cues affect face evaluations: the effect of facial emotion

Open access
Bayliss, Andrew P., Griffiths, Debra, Tipper, Steven P.·2009·European Journal of Cognitive Psychology

Abstract

When we see someone change their direction of gaze, we spontaneously follow their eyes because we expect people to look at interesting objects. Bayliss and Tipper (2006) examined the consequences of observing this expectancy being either confirmed or violated by faces producing reliable or unreliable gaze cues. Participants viewed different faces that would consistently look at the target, or consistently look away from the target: The faces that consistently looked towards targets were subsequently chosen as being more trustworthy than the faces that consistently looked away from targets. The current work demonstrates that these gaze contingency effects are only detected when faces create a positive social context by smiling, but not in the negative context when all the faces held angry or neutral expressions. These data suggest that implicit processing of the reward contingencies associated with gaze cues relies on a positive emotional expression to maintain expectations of a favourable outcome of joint attention episodes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09541440802553490

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bayliss, A. P., Griffiths, D., & Tipper, S. P.
Affiliations
Bangor University (GB)
Corresponding author
Bayliss, Andrew P.
Venue
European Journal of Cognitive Psychology
Published
2009-11
Volume
21
Issue
7
Pages
1072-1084
ISSN
  • 0954-1446 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0635
OpenAlex
W2167346576
Cited by
42
References
25
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The European Journal of Cognitive Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
  • Leverhulme Trust
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
gaze cues, facial emotion, trustworthiness judgments, joint attention, smiling, anger, reward contingency, implicit processing, social evaluation, gaze direction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review