The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Total quality management in UK higher education institutions
Abstract
Total quality management (TQM) is a management process that has made its way into higher education institutions (HEIs) in many developed countries. For example, in the US, HEIs have been influenced due to the success of many large corporations. They were influenced by the critical state of education in the 1980s in terms of student grades, funding, and complaints from employers and parents. Many institutions began to implement it in the early 1990s and have been successful. In UK higher education, the progress of TQM is rather slow, with examples represented by only a few new universities. However, these institutions have benefited from a TQM process similar to their counterparts in the US, such as improved student performance, better services, reduced costs and customer satisfaction. The paper reports on the results of a recent survey on TQM in UK HEIs. The authors examine how TQM principles and core concepts can be measured to provide a means of assessing the quality of institutions on various aspects of their internal processes. It is found that the measurements of TQM principles and core concepts, which are critical success factors, reflect performance of institutions. Any change in the performance of the critical success factors affects the institution's business excellence. It also provides information to the institution's top management on its performance over time and in comparison with other institutions. The measurement method could be used by the quality assurers in the UK to assess education quality of HEIs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Evaluation of the factors that determine quality in higher education: an empirical study
Tsinidou, M., Gerogiannis, V., & Fitsilis, P. (2010) · Quality Assurance in Education · doi:10.1108/09684881011058669 · Cited by 408
Education as Service: The Understanding of University Experience Through the Service Logic
Ng, I. C. L., & Forbes, J. (2009) · Journal of Marketing for Higher Education · doi:10.1080/08841240902904703 · Cited by 302
Are students customers? TQM and marketing perspectives
Eagle, L., & Brennan, R. (2007) · Quality Assurance in Education · doi:10.1108/09684880710723025 · Cited by 288
Cruickshank, M. (2003) · Total Quality Management & Business Excellence · doi:10.1080/1478336032000107717 · Cited by 130
Fontalvo, T. J., & De La Hoz, E. J. (2018) · Formación universitaria · doi:10.4067/s0718-50062018000100035 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Kanji, G. K., Malek, A., & Tambi, B. A.
- Venue
- Total Quality Management
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1999-01
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 129-153
- ISSN
- 0954-4127 (ISSN-L)
- 1360-0613
- OpenAlex
- W2075265176
- Cited by
- 362
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Total quality management in UK higher education institutions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/0954412998126
- The paper
- Kanji, G. K., Malek, A., & Tambi, B. A. (1999). Total quality management in UK higher education institutions. Total Quality Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/0954412998126
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.