The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Gold microspheres: a selective technique for producing biologically effective dose enhancement
Abstract
PURPOSE: To investigate dose enhancement and radiosensitization associated with electrons produced and scattered from gold particles suspended in cells in vitro and with tumour cells growing in vivo irradiated with low-energy photons. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CHO-K1, EMT-6 and DU-145 cells were irradiated with kilovoltage X-ray and Cs-137 beams in slowly stirred suspensions in the presence of various concentrations of gold particles ( 1.5-3.0 microm); cell survival was measured by clonogenic assay. Gold particles were injected directly into EMT-6 tumours growing in scid mice prior to their irradiation. Tumour cell killing was assayed by an in vivo-in vitro technique. RESULTS: Dose enhancement was confirmed by both Fricke dosimetry and cell killing for 100, 140, 200 and 240 kVp X-rays, but not for Cs-137 gamma-rays. For the chemical dosimeter, a dose enhancement (DMF) of 1.42 was measured for 1% gold particle solutions irradiated with 200 kVp X-rays. When rodent and human cells were irradiated in the presence of 1% gold particles, DMF values at the 10% survival level ranged from 1.36 to 1.54, with an overall average value of 1.43. Preliminary attempts to deliver these gold particles to tumour cells in vivo by intra-tumour injection resulted in modest radiosensitization but extremely heterogeneous distribution. CONCLUSIONS: An increased biologically effective dose can be produced by gold microspheres suspended in cell culture or distributed in tumour tissue exposed to kilovoltage photon beams. With the increasing use of interstitial brachytherapy with isotopes that produce low-energy photons, high-Z particles might find a role for significantly improving the therapeutic ratio.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The use of gold nanoparticles to enhance radiotherapy in mice
Hainfeld, J. F., Slatkin, D. N., & Smilowitz, H. M. (2004) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/0031-9155/49/18/n03 · Cited by 1,638
Gold Nanomaterials at Work in Biomedicine
Yang, X., Yang, M., Pang, B., Vara, M., & Xia, Y. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00193 · Cited by 1,162
Gold nanoparticles for applications in cancer radiotherapy: Mechanisms and recent advancements
Her, S., Jaffray, D. A., & Allen, C. (2017) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2015.12.012 · Cited by 865
Radiotherapy enhancement with gold nanoparticles
Hainfeld, J. F., Dilmanian, F. A., Slatkin, D. N., & Smilowitz, H. M. (2008) · Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology · doi:10.1211/jpp.60.8.0005 · Cited by 733
Physical basis and biological mechanisms of gold nanoparticle radiosensitization
Butterworth, K. T., McMahon, S. J., Currell, F. J., & Prise, K. M. (2012) · Nanoscale · doi:10.1039/c2nr31227a · Cited by 478
Metadata
- Authors
- M. Herold, I. J. D.
- Venue
- International Journal of Radiation Biology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2000-01
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1357-1364
- ISSN
- 0955-3002 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-3095
- OpenAlex
- W2097157816
- Cited by
- 306
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gold microspheres: a selective technique for producing biologically effective dose enhancement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/09553000050151637
- The paper
- M. Herold, I. J. D. (2000). Gold microspheres: a selective technique for producing biologically effective dose enhancement. International Journal of Radiation Biology. https://doi.org/10.1080/09553000050151637
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.