The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Protection of DNA Molecules of Cultured Mammalian Cells from Radiation-induced Single-strand Scissions by Various Alcohols and SH Compounds
Abstract
SummaryThe addition of alcohols (methanol, ethanol, t-butanol, ethylene glycol, and glycerol), SH compounds (cysteamine, cysteine and mercaptoethanol) and cystamine protected DNA molecules of mammalian cells from radiation-induced single-strand scissions. The protection afforded with these scavengers increased as their concentrations were increased, but always only up to a certain maximum. The maximum protection was the same for all the alcohols and cystamine, but another maximum was found for all the SH compounds. The extent of radiation-induced single-strand breaks can therefore be grouped into protectable and non-protectable fractions.In the protectable fraction, there is a linear relationship between the scavenger concentrations for half maximum protection and the reaction rate constants for the OH radical reacting with the scavengers. No such linear relationship was demonstrated with rate constants of H and eaq−. This leads us to the following suggestions: (1) that the protectable fraction is mostly of indirect action; (2) that the OH radical plays a major role in radiation-induced single-strand breaks of DNA in cultured mammalian cells; (3) that a major protection mechanism in indirect action is radical scavenging (or a competitive reaction); and (4) that the protection mechanism by SH compounds may consist of radical scavenging as well as some other type of reaction(s) resulting in radiation protection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Complexity of DNA Damage: Relevance to Biological Consequences
Ward, J. F. (1994) · International Journal of Radiation Biology · doi:10.1080/09553009414551401 · Cited by 633
Targeted cytoplasmic irradiation with alpha particles induces mutations in mammalian cells
Wu, L.-J., Randers-Pehrson, G., Xu, A., Waldren, C. A., Geard, C. R., Yu, Z., & Hei, T. K. (1999) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.96.9.4959 · Cited by 444
The genomics of oxidative DNA damage, repair, and resulting mutagenesis
Poetsch, A. R. (2020) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2019.12.013 · Cited by 420
Contributions of direct and indirect actions in cell killing by high-LET radiations
Hirayama, R., Ito, A., Tomita, M., Tsukada, T., Yatagai, F., Noguchi, M., Matsumoto, Y., Kase, Y., Ando, K., Okayasu, R., et al. (2009) · Radiation Research · doi:10.1667/rr1490.1 · Cited by 159
Poetsch, A. R., Boulton, S. J., & Luscombe, N. M. (2018) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-018-1582-2 · Cited by 132
Metadata
- Authors
- Roots, R., & Okada, S.
- Venue
- International Journal of Radiation Biology and Related Studies in Physics, Chemistry and Medicine
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1972-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 329-342
- ISSN
- 0020-7616 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2062578223
- Cited by
- 293
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Protection of DNA Molecules of Cultured Mammalian Cells from Radiation-induced Single-strand Scissions by Various Alcohols and SH Compounds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/09553007214550401
- The paper
- Roots, R., & Okada, S. (1972). Protection of DNA Molecules of Cultured Mammalian Cells from Radiation-induced Single-strand Scissions by Various Alcohols and SH Compounds. International Journal of Radiation Biology and Related Studies in Physics, Chemistry and Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1080/09553007214550401
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.