The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Causes and consequences of psychological contracts among knowledge workers in the high technology and financial services industries
Abstract
As organizations shift the central focus of their competitive strategy away from value appropriation towards value creation it is to knowledge workers that they will look to provide the innovation to fuel their continued development. The state of the relationship between the knowledge worker and the employer - the psychological contract - will determine whether this source of innovation and creativity is released. In this study, we developed and tested a causal model of the causes and consequences of psychological contract. Over four hundred participants who were knowledge employees drawn from eleven leading edge companies in the high-technology software, manufacturing and financial services sector participated in the study. We found support for the hypothesis that the psychological contract and those organizational processes relating to procedural justice would have a direct effect on two critical organizational outcomes, namely, employee commitment and intention to remain with the organization. We also found support for the hypothesis that psychological contract variables mediated the relationship between organizational processes and employee commitment and intention to stay with the organization.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adams, J. S. (1965) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60108-2 · Cited by 10,818
Psychological Contracts in Organizations: Understanding Written and Unwritten Agreements
Rousseau, D. (1995) · doi:10.4135/9781452231594 · Cited by 3,453
The Coming of the Post-Industrial Society
Bell, D. (1976) · The Educational Forum · doi:10.1080/00131727609336501 · Cited by 2,777
Cited by
Fostering knowledge sharing through people management practices
Cabrera, E. F., & Cabrera, A. (2005) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585190500083020 · Cited by 1,170
Determinants of Innovative Work Behaviour: Development and Test of an Integrated Model
Ramamoorthy, N., Flood, P. C., Slattery, T., & Sardessai, R. (2005) · Creativity and Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8691.2005.00334.x · Cited by 484
Self-citationThe psychological contract: A critical review
Cullinane, N., & Dundon, T. (2006) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2006.00123.x · Cited by 393
O'Neill, B. S., & Adya, M. (2007) · Journal of Managerial Psychology · doi:10.1108/02683940710745969 · Cited by 173
Predictors and Outcomes of Relational and Transactional Psychological Contract
Aggarwal, U., & Bhargava, S. (2010) · Psychological Studies · doi:10.1007/s12646-010-0033-2 · Cited by 43
Metadata
- Authors
- Flood, P. C., Turner, T., Ramamoorthy, N., & Pearson, J.
- Venue
- The International Journal of Human Resource Management
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2001-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1152-1165
- ISSN
- 0958-5192 (ISSN-L)
- 1466-4399
- OpenAlex
- W1968927035
- Cited by
- 213
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 9.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Causes and consequences of psychological contracts among knowledge workers in the high technology and financial services industries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/09585190110068368
- The paper
- Flood, P. C., Turner, T., Ramamoorthy, N., & Pearson, J. (2001). Causes and consequences of psychological contracts among knowledge workers in the high technology and financial services industries. The International Journal of Human Resource Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190110068368
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.