The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Determinants of Innovative Work Behaviour: Development and Test of an Integrated Model
Open accessAbstract
In this study, we developed and tested a causal model to predict innovative work behaviour (IWB) integrating the literatures on psychological contract, job design and organizational justice. Two hundred and four employees from Irish manufacturing organizations participated in the study, and we collected data using a survey questionnaire. The psychological contract variable of perceived obligation to innovate, job autonomy and pay showed direct effects on IWB. In addition, pay and job autonomy also had indirect effects on IWB through the mediating variable of psychological contract – perceived obligation to innovate. The organizational process of meritocracy, equity perceptions and procedural justice perceptions influenced IWB through the mediating variables of psychological contract, although none of these variables influenced IWB directly. Overall, the results indicated good support for the integrative model and provided support for the crucial role played by psychological contract in influencing IWB. Implications are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adams, J. S. (1965) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60108-2 · Cited by 10,818
Job demands, perceptions of effort‐reward fairness and innovative work behaviour
Janssen, O. (2000) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1348/096317900167038 · Cited by 2,816
CULTURES CONSEQUENCES: INTERNATIONAL DIFFERENCES IN WORK RELATED VALUES
Hofestede, G. (1980) · Cited by 1,983
Rousseau, D. M. (1990) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.4030110506 · Cited by 1,811
The effects of met expectations on newcomer attitudes and behaviors: A review and meta-analysis.
Wanous, J. P., Poland, T. D., Premack, S. L., & Davis, K. S. (1992) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-9010.77.3.288 · Cited by 634
The Content of the Psychological Contract
Herriot, P., Manning, W. E. G., & Kidd, J. M. (1997) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.0047 · Cited by 486
Williams, H. (2002) · Nottingham Trent University's Institutional Repository (Nottingham Trent Repository) · Cited by 263
Flood, P. C., Turner, T., Ramamoorthy, N., & Pearson, J. (2001) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585190110068368 · Cited by 213
Self-citationThe psychological contract: A concept in need of closer scrutiny?
Arnold, J. (1996) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/13594329608414876 · Cited by 158
Lester, S. W., Claire, E., & Kickul, J. (2001) · Human Resource Planning · Cited by 134
Cited by
Rosenbusch, N., Brinckmann, J., & Bausch, A. (2011) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.12.002 · Cited by 1,888
Predictors of individual-level innovation at work: A meta-analysis.
Hammond, M. M., Neff, N. L., Farr, J. L., Schwall, A. R., & Zhao, X. (2011) · Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts · doi:10.1037/a0018556 · Cited by 783
Newman, A., Tse, H. H. M., Schwarz, G., & Nielsen, I. (2018) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.04.001 · Cited by 527
HRM and innovative work behaviour: A systematic literature review
Bos-Nehles, A., Renkema, M., & Janssen, M. (2017) · Personnel Review · doi:10.1108/pr-09-2016-0257 · Cited by 430
De Spiegelaere, S., Van Gyes, G., De Witte, H., Niesen, W., & Van Hootegem, G. (2014) · Creativity and Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/caim.12079 · Cited by 379
Metadata
- Authors
- Ramamoorthy, N., Flood, P. C., Slattery, T., & Sardessai, R.
- Venue
- Creativity and Innovation Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-06
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 142-150
- ISSN
- 0963-1690 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8691
- OpenAlex
- W2057355247
- Cited by
- 484
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 6.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Determinants of Innovative Work Behaviour: Development and Test of an Integrated Model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2005.00334.x
- The paper
- Ramamoorthy, N., Flood, P. C., Slattery, T., & Sardessai, R. (2005). Determinants of Innovative Work Behaviour: Development and Test of an Integrated Model. Creativity and Innovation Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2005.00334.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
