The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An analysis of employee recognition: Perspectives on human resources practices
Abstract
Employee recognition is as much an organizational management issue as it is one related to the basic needs of individuals. Although it is gaining wider and wider currency in sociology and organizational psychology circles, this complex notion is still fairly vague in the management world. What exactly is employee recognition? What are its limitations and conceptual nuances? What does the act of recognition entail? These are the central questions addressed by this article. The article starts by examining the growing need for recognition expressed by today's workers. It then goes on to provide an overview of the social and organizational context surrounding the issue. Finally, it presents the various approaches and methods used to promote employee recognition, as well as the sources of this recognition within an organization. Four conceptual approaches to recognition are analyzed: the ethical perspective; the humanistic and existential view; the work psychodynamics school; and the behavioural outlook. An analysis of these different theoretical perspectives reveals that recognition takes four main forms: personal recognition; recognition of results; recognition of work practice; and recognition of job dedication. The field of recognition, meanwhile, is characterized by the presence of five types of interactions: organizational; vertical; horizontal; external and social.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1207/s15327965pli1104_01 · Cited by 34,210
Adverse health effects of high-effort/low-reward conditions.
Siegrist, J. (1996) · Journal of Occupational Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/1076-8998.1.1.27 · Cited by 5,713
Cited by
Anthropotropism: Searching for Recognition in the Scandinavian Gig Economy
Newlands, G. (2022) · Sociology · doi:10.1177/00380385211063362 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- Brun, J.-P., & Dugas, N.
- Venue
- The International Journal of Human Resource Management
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2008-04
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 716-730
- ISSN
- 0958-5192 (ISSN-L)
- 1466-4399
- OpenAlex
- W2147118054
- Cited by
- 310
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.