Cited by 39Digital Economy and Work TransformationLegal and Labor StudiesEmployment, Labor, and Gender Studies

Anthropotropism: Searching for Recognition in the Scandinavian Gig Economy

Open access
Newlands, Gemma·2022·Sociology

Abstract

By curtailing workplace socialisation, platform-mediated gig work hinders the development of affective relationships necessary for the experience of recognition. However, extant research into recognition at work has typically only focused on face-to-face interactions, overlooking technologically complex forms of work where recognition might be sought from and via technical intermediaries. Advancing sociological research into the lived experience of contemporary gig workers, this article draws on 41 interviews with Foodora riders in Norway and Sweden to explore how gig workers solicit and experience recognition at work. I identify a process of anthropotropism, whereby gig workers turn to human connections where possible in an attempt to pursue traditional social scripts of collegiality and to gain recognition from legitimate human sources. Further, I identify how platform-mediated communication does not prohibit recognition, but intermittent automation and neoliberal modes of instrumentalising recognition can disrupt the development of individual subjectivities and lead to feelings of mechanistic dehumanisation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/00380385211063362

Cites

88 of 88 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Blonk L, Huijben T, Bredewold F, et al. (2019) Balancing care and work: A case study of recogni- tion in social enterprise. Disability & Society 35(2): 1-21.
  2. Dejours C (2007) Subjectivity, work, and action. In: Deranty JP, Petherbridge D, Rundell J, et al. (eds) Recognition, Work, Politics: New Directions in French Critical Theory. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill, pp.71-87.
  3. Gorz A (1999) Beyond the Wage-Based Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  4. Laitinen A (2016) Robots and human sociality: Normative expectations, the need for recognition, and the social bases of self-esteem. In: Seibt J, Nørskov M and Schack Andersen S (eds) What Social Robots Can and Should Do. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS Press, pp.313-331.
  5. Mead GH (1932) Mind, Self, and Society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  6. Meijerink J and Keegan A (2019) Conceptualizing human resource management in the gig econ- omy. Journal of Managerial Psychology 34(4): 214-232.
  7. Wagner G (2012) 'Exclusive focus on figures. Exclusive focus on returns'. Marketisation as a principle of organisation and a problem of recognition. In: Smith NH and Deranty J-P (eds) New Philosophies of Labour: Work and the Social Bond. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill, pp.301-326.
  8. Woodcock J (2020) The algorithmic panopticon at Deliveroo: Measurement, precarity, and the illusion of control. Ephemera 20(3): 67-95.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Newlands, G.
Affiliations
BI Norwegian Business School (NO)
Corresponding author
Newlands, Gemma
Venue
Sociology
Published
2022-01-27
Volume
56
Issue
5
Pages
821-838
ISSN
  • 0038-0385 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8684
OpenAlex
W4210413244
Cited by
39
References
88
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5
FWCI
12.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sociology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Norges Forskningsråd (275347)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Economy and Work Transformation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Industrial relations › Legal and Labor Studies
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Employment, Labor, and Gender Studies
Keywords
gig economy, employee recognition, platform work, collegiality, automation, neoliberalism, dehumanization, subjectivity, affective bonds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review