The DOI matches its Crossref record; 101 of the 101 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Generations at work: are there differences and do they matter?
Abstract
In recent years, there has been, particularly among human resource management practitioners, a view that important inter-generational differences exist among workers and that these differences provide challenges to managers in effectively managing their workforce. While such views have been challenged, academic research into inter-generational differences and its effects has been limited. Our paper seeks to fill this vacuum by addressing the question as to whether there are differences between generations in their orientations and attitudes to work. This paper explores the differences in job satisfaction, organizational commitment and the willingness to quit of two groups of workers; the Baby Boomers and Generation X. Using a large-scale survey of employees of a large public sector research organization, we find that the Boomers do have higher job satisfaction and a lower willingness to quit than their Generation X colleagues. We also find that there are some important differences in the antecedents of these variables between the two groups. This paper concludes by considering the implications of the findings for management practice and theory.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests
Cronbach, L. J. (1951) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02310555 · Cited by 43,931
The Competitive Advantage of Nations
Clark, T., & Porter, M. W. (1991) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1251962 · Cited by 17,449
Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.
Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0046016 · Cited by 17,116
The Competitive Advantage of Nations
Porter, M. E. (1990) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-11336-1 · Cited by 15,654
(1993) · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · doi:10.1016/0002-8223(93)92196-5 · Cited by 11,976
Review of Psychometric theory (2nd ed.).
SITGREAVES, R. (1979) · Contemporary Psychology: A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.1037/018882 · Cited by 11,425
What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications
Cortina, J. M. (1993) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.98 · Cited by 8,810 · cited 1×
“7 is considered to be the lower bounds for inclusion of a scale (Nunnally 1978 ; Cortina 1993 ), further testing following the method outlined by Cortina ( 1993 ) and examination of the inter-item and item-total correlations were carried out on the two items making up this scale.”
MethodThe measurement of organizational commitment
Mowday, R. T., Steers, R. M., & Porter, L. W. (1979) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/0001-8791(79)90072-1 · Cited by 8,752
Mathieu, J. E., & Zajac, D. M. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.108.2.171 · Cited by 6,449
The machine that changed the world
(1992) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/0024-6301(92)90400-v · Cited by 5,805
Cited by
Festing, M., & Schäfer, L. (2014) · Journal of World Business · doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2013.11.010 · Cited by 306
Generation X and Knowledge Work: The Impact of ICT. What Are the Implications for HRM?
Sarti, D., & Torre, T. (2018) · Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-62051-0_19 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Benson, J., & Brown, M.
- Venue
- The International Journal of Human Resource Management
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2011-05
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1843-1865
- ISSN
- 0958-5192 (ISSN-L)
- 1466-4399
- OpenAlex
- W2006483866
- Cited by
- 260
- References
- 101
- FWCI
- 51.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Generations at work: are there differences and do they matter? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/09585192.2011.573966
- The paper
- Benson, J., & Brown, M. (2011). Generations at work: are there differences and do they matter? The International Journal of Human Resource Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2011.573966
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.