The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
The role of context in overcoming distance-related problems in global virtual teams: an organizational discontinuity theory perspective
Open accessAbstract
Working at a distance has become a hot topic since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. One type of work unit that naturally faces both physical and social distance is the Global Virtual Teams (GVT). While distance has been debated in the GVT literature, there is still a scarcity of research on how to deal with distance related problems. Guided by organizational discontinuity theory, we explore the effect of individual-level approaches to overcoming physical distance (time zone adjustment) and social distance (trust in peers) in GVTs. In addition, we assess how these mechanisms are affected by the team context in the form of openness to cultural diversity. We do this by studying 23 GVTs (171 team members and 23 team leaders) in the global R&D department of a Danish engineering company. Our findings demonstrate that trust in peers is positively associated with job role clarity and job performance at the individual-level, and that high team openness to diversity, in the case of performance, makes the individual’s level of trust in peers less necessary for achieving performance. Our results also show that time zone adjustment increases job role clarity for the individual team member, but only in GVTs with high openness to cultural diversity. Based on this, we contribute to the organizational discontinuity theory by demonstrating how continuity-creating mechanisms can interact with the team context to ultimately support the individual’s potential for handling distance in GVTs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Many studies have suggested that the pandemic has broken down the resistance of enterprises to use digital technologies and has accelerated the digitization process (Lauring et al., 2022).”
From Digital Transformation in International Trade: Opportunities, Challenges, and Policy Implications (2025) · cites this paper as Lauring et al., 2022
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 102 · Cited by 38
Research works printed but not linked: 95
- 10.1177/0149206313478188 · DOI
- Allen T. J., 1977, Managing the flow of technology
- 10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00155-8 · DOI
- 10.1111/isj.12217 · DOI
- 10.1177/1046496403256011 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0019-8501(00)00126-7 · DOI
- 10.1108/IJCMA-04-2013-0023 · DOI
- 10.5465/amj.2008.34789630 · DOI
- Bente G., 2005, 8th Annual International Workshop on Presence, 97
- 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2008.00322.x · DOI
- 10.1177/014920638901500403 · DOI
- 10.1002/hrm.21589 · DOI
- 10.1108/02683941011048418 · DOI
- 10.1108/02683941211252446 · DOI
- 10.1177/0018726718818721 · DOI
- 10.5465/amr.2007.24351441 · DOI
- 10.1177/2329488416633847 · DOI
- 10.1111/caim.12039 · DOI
- 10.1111/1464-0597.00143 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0035679 · DOI
- 10.1002/hrm.20215 · DOI
- Cheng C., 2020, Shopify is joining Twitter in permanent work-from-home shift
- 10.1111/jan.12202 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.chb.2018.09.032 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1365-2575.2005.00200.x · DOI
- Colazo J., 2009, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 60, 997
- 10.1109/TPC.2004.828203 · DOI
- 10.22215/timreview/765 · DOI
- 10.1093/ei/cbi043 · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.12.3.346.10098 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.intcom.2006.07.010 · DOI
- Denzin N. K., 1998, The landscape of qualitative research: Theories and issue
- 10.1287/orsc.12.4.450.10640 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0018726709354784 · DOI
- 10.1177/0149206316630380 · DOI
- 10.2307/256155 · DOI
- 10.2307/1556384 · DOI
- 10.1002/spip.185 · DOI
- Festing M., 2020, LSE Business Review, 1, 1
- 10.1016/j.geb.2010.09.004 · DOI
- 10.1177/1523422314532097 · DOI
- 10.1177/0149206314559946 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/job.94 · DOI
- 10.2224/sbp.1996.24.2.119 · DOI
- 10.1177/1046496416653480 · DOI
- Harman H. H., 1976, Modern factor analysis
- 10.1111/jan.12233 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2006.00281.x · DOI
- 10.5465/amj.2007.28166219 · DOI
- 10.1177/1059601103254269 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.respol.2004.06.005 · DOI
- 10.1080/07421222.1998.11518185 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1287/orsc.10.6.791 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1573-7861.2009.01119.x · DOI
- 10.5465/amj.2009.41331431 · DOI · Paper page
- Kiesler S., 2002, What do we know about proximity and distance in work groups? A legacy of research, distributed work
- 10.1007/s11575-018-0344-4 · DOI
- 10.1177/1059601192172004 · DOI
- 10.5465/ame.2002.8540322 · DOI
- 10.1177/109442810033001 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2015.05.006 · DOI
- 10.1037/amp0000716 · DOI
- 10.1111/1748-8583.12184 · DOI
- 10.1177/2329488415572779 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1740-4762.2011.01011.x · DOI
- 10.4337/9780857933461.00022 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tics.2014.03.001 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11575-006-0123-5 · DOI
- 10.1037/h0076754 · DOI
- 10.1002/hrm.21658 · DOI
- 10.2307/3069399 · DOI
- 10.1002/smi.1327 · DOI
- O’Hara-Devereaux M., 1994, Global work: Bridging distance, culture, and time
- 10.3102/10769986031004437 · DOI
- Rabe-Hesketh S., 2012, Multilevel and longitudinal modeling using Stata, 3
- 10.1177/014920630102700309 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/2391486 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/2392563 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.4018/irmj.2003040103 · DOI
- Saunders E. G., 2020, Harvard Business Review
- 10.1007/978-1-4939-2050-1_2 · DOI
- Shoemaker M. E., 1999, Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 19, 1
- 10.1177/1094428109351241 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0090-2616(96)90013-3 · DOI
- 10.1080/14697010701799445 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.intman.2019.100689 · DOI
- 10.1057/jibs.2013.64 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.intman.2017.04.002 · DOI
- van Knippenberg D., Group and Organization Management
- 10.1007/978-3-319-94487-6_6 · DOI
- 10.1108/09593840210444746 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1287/orsc.10.6.777 · DOI
- 10.1177/0170840607083105 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/13678868.2020.1779169 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.intman.2016.09.002 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Lauring, J., Drogendijk, R., & Kubovcikova, A.
- Affiliations
- Aarhus University (DK)
- University of Groningen (NL)
- Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Corresponding author
- Lauring, Jakob
- Venue
- The International Journal of Human Resource Management
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2021-08-29
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 4251-4283
- ISSN
- 0958-5192 (ISSN-L)
- 1466-4399
- OpenAlex
- W3197328531
- Semantic Scholar
- d7e3436b37c5794238a8b7ff6f77e1b1c3daa71a
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 102
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 4.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- research.rug.nl
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- The International Journal of Human Resource Management (publishedVersion)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Business and International Management › Global and Cross-Cultural Management
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Work-Family Balance Challenges
- Keywords
- global virtual teams, physical distance, social distance, peer trust, cultural diversity, employee performance, team context, remote work, R&D teams
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The role of context in overcoming distance-related problems in global virtual teams: an organizational discontinuity theory perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/09585192.2021.1960584
- The paper
- Lauring, J., Drogendijk, R., & Kubovcikova, A. (2022). The role of context in overcoming distance-related problems in global virtual teams: an organizational discontinuity theory perspective. The International Journal of Human Resource Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2021.1960584