Cited by 38Team Dynamics and PerformanceGlobal and Cross-Cultural ManagementWork-Family Balance Challenges

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

The role of context in overcoming distance-related problems in global virtual teams: an organizational discontinuity theory perspective

Open access
Lauring, Jakob, Drogendijk, Rian, Kubovcikova, Annamaria·2022·The International Journal of Human Resource Management

Abstract

Working at a distance has become a hot topic since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. One type of work unit that naturally faces both physical and social distance is the Global Virtual Teams (GVT). While distance has been debated in the GVT literature, there is still a scarcity of research on how to deal with distance related problems. Guided by organizational discontinuity theory, we explore the effect of individual-level approaches to overcoming physical distance (time zone adjustment) and social distance (trust in peers) in GVTs. In addition, we assess how these mechanisms are affected by the team context in the form of openness to cultural diversity. We do this by studying 23 GVTs (171 team members and 23 team leaders) in the global R&D department of a Danish engineering company. Our findings demonstrate that trust in peers is positively associated with job role clarity and job performance at the individual-level, and that high team openness to diversity, in the case of performance, makes the individual’s level of trust in peers less necessary for achieving performance. Our results also show that time zone adjustment increases job role clarity for the individual team member, but only in GVTs with high openness to cultural diversity. Based on this, we contribute to the organizational discontinuity theory by demonstrating how continuity-creating mechanisms can interact with the team context to ultimately support the individual’s potential for handling distance in GVTs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09585192.2021.1960584

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 102 · Cited by 38

Research works printed but not linked: 95

  1. 10.1177/0149206313478188 · DOI
  2. Allen T. J., 1977, Managing the flow of technology
  3. 10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00155-8 · DOI
  4. 10.1111/isj.12217 · DOI
  5. 10.1177/1046496403256011 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/S0019-8501(00)00126-7 · DOI
  7. 10.1108/IJCMA-04-2013-0023 · DOI
  8. 10.5465/amj.2008.34789630 · DOI
  9. Bente G., 2005, 8th Annual International Workshop on Presence, 97
  10. 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2008.00322.x · DOI
  11. 10.1177/014920638901500403 · DOI
  12. 10.1002/hrm.21589 · DOI
  13. 10.1108/02683941011048418 · DOI
  14. 10.1108/02683941211252446 · DOI
  15. 10.1177/0018726718818721 · DOI
  16. 10.5465/amr.2007.24351441 · DOI
  17. 10.1177/2329488416633847 · DOI
  18. 10.1111/caim.12039 · DOI
  19. 10.1111/1464-0597.00143 · DOI
  20. 10.1037/a0035679 · DOI
  21. 10.1002/hrm.20215 · DOI
  22. Cheng C., 2020, Shopify is joining Twitter in permanent work-from-home shift
  23. 10.1111/jan.12202 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.chb.2018.09.032 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1111/j.1365-2575.2005.00200.x · DOI
  26. Colazo J., 2009, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 60, 997
  27. 10.1109/TPC.2004.828203 · DOI
  28. 10.22215/timreview/765 · DOI
  29. 10.1093/ei/cbi043 · DOI
  30. 10.1287/orsc.12.3.346.10098 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1016/j.intcom.2006.07.010 · DOI
  32. Denzin N. K., 1998, The landscape of qualitative research: Theories and issue
  33. 10.1287/orsc.12.4.450.10640 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1177/0018726709354784 · DOI
  35. 10.1177/0149206316630380 · DOI
  36. 10.2307/256155 · DOI
  37. 10.2307/1556384 · DOI
  38. 10.1002/spip.185 · DOI
  39. Festing M., 2020, LSE Business Review, 1, 1
  40. 10.1016/j.geb.2010.09.004 · DOI
  41. 10.1177/1523422314532097 · DOI
  42. 10.1177/0149206314559946 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1002/job.94 · DOI
  44. 10.2224/sbp.1996.24.2.119 · DOI
  45. 10.1177/1046496416653480 · DOI
  46. Harman H. H., 1976, Modern factor analysis
  47. 10.1111/jan.12233 · DOI
  48. 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2006.00281.x · DOI
  49. 10.5465/amj.2007.28166219 · DOI
  50. 10.1177/1059601103254269 · DOI
  51. 10.1016/j.respol.2004.06.005 · DOI
  52. 10.1080/07421222.1998.11518185 · DOI · Paper page
  53. 10.1287/orsc.10.6.791 · DOI · Paper page
  54. 10.1111/j.1573-7861.2009.01119.x · DOI
  55. 10.5465/amj.2009.41331431 · DOI · Paper page
  56. Kiesler S., 2002, What do we know about proximity and distance in work groups? A legacy of research, distributed work
  57. 10.1007/s11575-018-0344-4 · DOI
  58. 10.1177/1059601192172004 · DOI
  59. 10.5465/ame.2002.8540322 · DOI
  60. 10.1177/109442810033001 · DOI
  61. 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2015.05.006 · DOI
  62. 10.1037/amp0000716 · DOI
  63. 10.1111/1748-8583.12184 · DOI
  64. 10.1177/2329488415572779 · DOI
  65. 10.1111/j.1740-4762.2011.01011.x · DOI
  66. 10.4337/9780857933461.00022 · DOI
  67. 10.1016/j.tics.2014.03.001 · DOI
  68. 10.1007/s11575-006-0123-5 · DOI
  69. 10.1037/h0076754 · DOI
  70. 10.1002/hrm.21658 · DOI
  71. 10.2307/3069399 · DOI
  72. 10.1002/smi.1327 · DOI
  73. O’Hara-Devereaux M., 1994, Global work: Bridging distance, culture, and time
  74. 10.3102/10769986031004437 · DOI
  75. Rabe-Hesketh S., 2012, Multilevel and longitudinal modeling using Stata, 3
  76. 10.1177/014920630102700309 · DOI · Paper page
  77. 10.2307/2391486 · DOI · Paper page
  78. 10.2307/2392563 · DOI · Paper page
  79. 10.4018/irmj.2003040103 · DOI
  80. Saunders E. G., 2020, Harvard Business Review
  81. 10.1007/978-1-4939-2050-1_2 · DOI
  82. Shoemaker M. E., 1999, Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 19, 1
  83. 10.1177/1094428109351241 · DOI · Paper page
  84. 10.1016/S0090-2616(96)90013-3 · DOI
  85. 10.1080/14697010701799445 · DOI
  86. 10.1016/j.intman.2019.100689 · DOI
  87. 10.1057/jibs.2013.64 · DOI
  88. 10.1016/j.intman.2017.04.002 · DOI
  89. van Knippenberg D., Group and Organization Management
  90. 10.1007/978-3-319-94487-6_6 · DOI
  91. 10.1108/09593840210444746 · DOI · Paper page
  92. 10.1287/orsc.10.6.777 · DOI
  93. 10.1177/0170840607083105 · DOI · Paper page
  94. 10.1080/13678868.2020.1779169 · DOI · Paper page
  95. 10.1016/j.intman.2016.09.002 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Lauring, J., Drogendijk, R., & Kubovcikova, A.
Affiliations
  • Aarhus University (DK)
  • University of Groningen (NL)
  • Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
Corresponding author
Lauring, Jakob
Venue
The International Journal of Human Resource Management
Published
2021-08-29
Volume
33
Issue
21
Pages
4251-4283
ISSN
  • 0958-5192 (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-4399
OpenAlex
W3197328531
Cited by
38
References
102
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
FWCI
4.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • The International Journal of Human Resource Management (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Business and International Management › Global and Cross-Cultural Management
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Work-Family Balance Challenges
Keywords
global virtual teams, physical distance, social distance, peer trust, cultural diversity, employee performance, team context, remote work, R&D teams

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The role of context in overcoming distance-related problems in global virtual teams: an organizational discontinuity theory perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/09585192.2021.1960584
The paper
Lauring, J., Drogendijk, R., & Kubovcikova, A. (2022). The role of context in overcoming distance-related problems in global virtual teams: an organizational discontinuity theory perspective. The International Journal of Human Resource Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2021.1960584