Human resource management and performance: a review and research agenda
Abstract
There is a growing body of evidence supporting an association between what are termed high performance or high commitment human resource management (HRM) practices and various measures of organizational performance. However, it is not clear why this association exists. This paper argues that to provide a convincing explanation of this association we need to improve our theoretical and analytic frameworks in three key areas. These are the nature of HRM, and especially the rationale for the specific lists of HR practices; the nature of organizational performance; and the linkage between HRM and performance. A model is presented within which to explore these linkages. The existing literature on HRM and performance is reviewed in the light of this analysis to identify key gaps in knowledge and help to focus further the research priorities.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The single-stakeholder perspective led to the adoption of a narrow focus on financial performance indicators and to attempts to prove that HRM contributed to firm performance.
“It led, in a short space of time, to the adoption of a narrow focus on financial performance indicators and to attempts to prove that HRM contributed to that firm performance (Guest, 1997;Paauwe et al., 2013).”
From Conceptualising the future of HRM and technology research (2016) · cites this paper as Guest, 1997
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations
Fiss, P. C. (2007) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2007.26586092 · Cited by 2,225 · see citing works
On the validity of subjective measures of company performance
WALL, T. D., MICHIE, J., PATTERSON, M., WOOD, S. J., SHEEHAN, M., CLEGG, C. W., & WEST, M. (2004) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2004.tb02485.x · Cited by 1,121 · see citing works
Conceptualising the future of HRM and technology research
Bondarouk, T., & Brewster, C. (2016) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2016.1232296 · Cited by 438 · see citing works
The link between e-HRM use and HRM effectiveness: an empirical study
Obeidat, S. M. (2016) · Personnel Review · doi:10.1108/pr-04-2015-0111 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
- Authors
- Guest, D. E.
- Corresponding author
- Guest, David E.
- ORCID
- Guest, David E.
- Venue
- The International Journal of Human Resource Management
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1997-01
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 263-276
- ISSN
- 0958-5192 (ISSN-L)
- 1466-4399
- OpenAlex
- W2008315121
- Cited by
- 1,908
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 43 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 93 · 2023: 70 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 74 · 2020: 79 · 2019: 90 · 2018: 70 · 2017: 77 · 2016: 79 · 2015: 131 · 2014: 94 · 2013: 99 · 2012: 102
- FWCI
- 38.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The International Journal of Human Resource Management (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Human Resource and Talent Management
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Employee Performance and Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Management and Organizational Practices
- Keywords
- human resource management practices, high-performance work practices, organizational performance, theoretical framework, research agenda
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review