Cited by 81Educational Technology in LearningEnglish Language Learning and TeachingOpen Education and E-Learning

Social networking: a collaborative open educational resource

Toetenel, Lisette·2014·Computer Assisted Language Learning

Abstract

Studies undertaken since the introduction of Web 2.0 have focussed mainly on open educational resources (OERs) such as email, blogging and virtual learning environments. No consistent efforts have been undertaken to study the use of social networking sites as a tool for learning in the second language classroom. This study examined the use of social networking sites as a means of establishing an asynchronous online environment for use in language learning in a classroom setting. The findings described are based on the use of a social networking site called Ning in a classroom during a summer school project, which was conducted at a further education college in the UK. The project focussed in particular on informal language practice when using social networking sites. The paper then examines the effect the use of the social networking tool had on group cohesion and learner-to-learner interaction, and how these, in turn, enhanced informal language learning due to an increase in learner collaboration. The study found that the use of Ning enhanced group cohesion and that learners started working in different groups once Ning was introduced. Finally, it highlights the potential technical and administrative barriers that can impede an institution in implementing its educational strategy in regards to OERs – in this case, social networking sites in the classroom. The further education college in which this study took place had no policies in place in regards to the use of OERs in th…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09588221.2013.818561

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Toetenel's study, a small number of students used the website outside class hours, and after the project ended, with one person using the site daily.

    “A small number of students used the website outside class hours, and after the project ended, with one person using the site daily.”
  • Toetenel (2014) emphasizes the social nature of second language learning, arguing that a communicative approach is consistent with collaborative learning and a sociocultural approach.

    “More recently Toetenel (2014) also emphasizes the social nature of second language learning, arguing that a communicative approach is consistent with collaborative learning and a sociocultural approach given that this emphasises meaning making and learning through interaction.”
  • In Toetenel's study, she recruited 15 students (144 posts) but 9 students mainly attended.

    “In her small study she recruited 15 students (144 posts) but 9 students mainly attended.”
  • Toetenel (2014) investigated the use of SNS in a small study where she established an asynchronous online environment for English classroom language learners.

    “Recently Toetenel (2014) investigated the use of SNS in a small study where she established an asynchronous online environment for English classroom language learners.”
  • In Toetenel's study, the data consisted of posts, student diaries and questionnaires and researcher observation.

    “The data consisted of posts, student diaries and questionnaires and researcher observation.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Toetenel, L.
Affiliations
Oxford Brookes University (GB)
Corresponding author
Toetenel, Lisette
Venue
Computer Assisted Language Learning
Published
2013-07-23
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
149-162
ISSN
  • 0958-8221 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-3210
OpenAlex
W2049574895
Cited by
81
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 2
FWCI
26.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Computer Assisted Language Learning (publishedVersion)
  • Open Research Online (The Open University) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology in Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › English Language Learning and Teaching
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Open Education and E-Learning
Keywords
social networking sites, open educational resources, Ning, second language acquisition, informal language learning, asynchronous online learning, group cohesion, student-student interaction, learner collaboration, further education, education policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review