Switching perspectives: from a language teacher to a designer of language learning with new technologies
Abstract
Despite abundant research on educational technology and strategic input in the field, various surveys have shown that (language) teachers do not seem to embrace in their teaching the full potential of information and communication technology available in our everyday life. Language students soon entering the professional field could accelerate the process, which highlights the role of teacher education in contributing to the change. The students should see how technology development may change the affordances for language learning, at the same time transforming the teachers’ professional roles and practices. However, taking an active role in designing a new kind of language pedagogy seems to be challenging for students. This study explores an attempt to facilitate the students’ perspective switch from the teacher role to the designer position through participatory design. This effort was to lead the students to envision new practices for language learning and teaching with new technologies. However, initial analyses of the research materials indicated that, despite the support, the students were not fully able to see their role as designers for the future. Cultural--historical activity theory was used to examine the problem more closely. The analysis suggests that in order to position themselves as designers of the future language learning activity, language students need to understand their role as designers, conduct real-life experiments on the evolving visions with their l…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Changing pedagogical thinking in relation to current technology-related pedagogical practices seems to be challenging for teachers and pre-service teachers.
“The rationale for the case under examination arose from research suggesting that changing pedagogical thinking in relation to current technology-related pedagogical practices seems to be challenging for teachers and pre-service teachers (e.g., Kuure et al., 2016; Fransson et al., 2019; Halkola and Kuure, 2021).”
From Educational Participatory Design in the Crossroads of Histories and Practices – Aiming for Digital Transformation in Language Pedagogy (2023) · cites this paper as Kuure et al., 2016
Aspects that made it more challenging for student teachers to adopt the PD stance included the historical background and mindset of language teacher education, accustomed views on language teaching and learning, the role of digital technology in those, and the common panopticon classroom.
“We identified a number of aspects that contributed to making it more challenging for the student teachers to adopt the PD stance (see also Kuure et al., 2016): the historical background and mindset of (language) teacher education, accustomed views on language teaching and learning, the role of digital technology in those, and the common panopticon classroom with the teacher as the hub for inter”
From Educational Participatory Design in the Crossroads of Histories and Practices – Aiming for Digital Transformation in Language Pedagogy (2023) · cites this paper as Kuure et al., 2016
Cites
Learning by Expanding: An Activity-Theoretical Approach to Developmental Research
Engeström, Y. (2014) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139814744 · Cited by 4,991 · see citing works
Nexus Analysis: Discourse and the Emerging Internet
Scollon, S. W., & Scollon, S. W. (2004) · doi:10.4324/9780203694343 · Cited by 700 · see citing works
Preparing language teachers to teach language online: a look at skills, roles, and responsibilities
Compton, L. K. L. (2009) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588220802613831 · Cited by 319 · cited 1× · see citing works
“While technology skills as such may be easy to promote, it may be more challenging to facilitate online socialising and community building as Compton (2009) maintains.”
BackgroundSocial interaction as apprenticeship in thinking: Guided participation in spatial planning.
Rogoff, B. (1991) · Perspectives on socially shared cognition. · doi:10.1037/10096-015 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kinnula, M., Iivari, N., Kuure, L., & Molin-Juustila, T. (2023) · Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1007/s10606-023-09473-8 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“The survey mapped schoolchildren’s interests and viewpoints related to language learning with technology (see Kuure et al., 2016).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationTowards a shared vision of language, language learning, and a school project in emergence
Tumelius, R., & Kuure, L. (2021) · Classroom Discourse · doi:10.1080/19463014.2020.1808495 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Kuure, L., Molin-Juustila, T., Keisanen, T., Riekki, M., Iivari, N., & Kinnula, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Oulu (FI)
- Corresponding author
- Kuure, Leena
- Venue
- Computer Assisted Language Learning
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2015-07-29
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 925-941
- ISSN
- 0958-8221 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-3210
- OpenAlex
- W2253077079
- Cited by
- 50
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 31.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Computer Assisted Language Learning (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › English Language Learning and Teaching
- Keywords
- language teacher education, participatory design, teacher role transformation, cultural-historical activity theory, activity systems, collaborative reflection, educational technology adoption
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review