Indigenous language revitalization, promotion, and education: function of digital technology
Abstract
Within the last two decades, there has been increased interest in how technology supports Indigenous language revitalization and reclamation efforts. This paper considers the effect technology has on Indigenous language learning and teaching, while conceptualizing how language educators, speakers, learners, and technology users holistically understand, skillfully apply and communicate creative and balanced technological solutions that are based on understanding of contextual factors. A total of 80 participants representing at least 47 Indigenous languages completed a survey in 2009 representing individuals, organizations, and institutions that serve one or more Indigenous language communities across the United States, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan, Guatemala, Peru, Greenland, Mexico, Bolivia, French Polynesia (Marquesas Islands and Tuamotu Islands), and Russia. The data reveal the functions digital technology has in Indigenous language revitalization, which include (1) positive and supportive roles (2) concerns, constraints, and tensions, and (3) Indigenous language education. Regardless of the size of the community, opportunities for using technology in Indigenous language revitalization efforts are shaped by linguistic, cultural, social, economic, environmental, and technological factors as expressed in the technacy framework for language revitalization. Findings indicate that technology has wide and mostly positive applications in language learning and teaching, that the benefits of those applications remain consistent across communities regardless of size and geographic location, and that new and innovative uses of technology are being adopted to support language revitalization efforts. Overall, the study underscores the importance of context in making grounded decisions about technology as a component of contemporary language revitalization efforts.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Decolonizing the digital landscape: the role of technology in Indigenous language revitalization
Meighan, P. J. (2021) · AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples · doi:10.1177/11771801211037672 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Exploring the presence of Cymraeg on TikTok
Cunliffe, D. (2025) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448241243096 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Kwok, J. C. Y. (2026) · AI & SOCIETY · doi:10.1007/s00146-026-03091-w · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Fayzrakhmanova, Y. S. (2025) · Sibirica · doi:10.3167/sib.2025.240104 · Cited by 1
- Authors
- Galla, C. K.
- Affiliations
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Galla, Candace Kaleimamoowahinekapu
- Venue
- Computer Assisted Language Learning
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2016-04-11
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1137-1151
- ISSN
- 0958-8221 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-3210
- OpenAlex
- W2325819138
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 29.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Computer Assisted Language Learning (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Multilingual Education and Policy
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistic and Sociocultural Studies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Mobile Learning in Education
- Keywords
- Indigenous language revitalization, digital technologies, indigenous language education, language teaching and learning, language communities, language reclamation, technology adoption
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review