Cited by 11Political Conflict and GovernanceTerrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political ViolenceDiverse Research Studies Overview

Formation of Insurgent Groups: MEND and Boko Haram in Nigeria

Ajala, Olayinka·2018·Small Wars & Insurgencies

Abstract

Contrary to earlier notions that religious diversity, ethnicity and the lack of economic development are the main factors responsible for the surge of violence in Nigeria, this article argues that the means of attaining or retaining political authority by politicians are responsible for violent conflicts and the formation of insurgent groups. Using theories of patrimonialism and prebendalism, the article argues that political power and authority are often channelled for personal use in a predatory manner that results in the formation of insurgent groups. The aim of this article is to proffer a different analytical framework for the understanding of the formation of insurgent groups based on political authority.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09592318.2018.1403744

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 31 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ajala, O.
Affiliations
University of York (GB)
Corresponding author
Ajala, Olayinka
Venue
Small Wars & Insurgencies
Published
2017-12-22
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
112-130
ISSN
  • 0959-2318 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-9558
OpenAlex
W2779234374
Cited by
11
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
4.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Small Wars and Insurgencies (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Diverse Research Studies Overview
Keywords
MenD, Boko Haram, political authority, patrimonialism, prebendalism, political violence, political elites, Nigeria

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review