Cited by 164Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchAdsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalEnvironmental remediation with nanomaterials

Sorption of perfluoroalkylated substances (PFASs) onto granular activated carbon and biochar

Zhang, Dongqing, He, Qiaochong, Wang, Mo, Zhang, Weilan, Liang, Yanna·2021·Environmental Technology

Abstract

Perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) have attracted increasing concerns owing to their potential ecotoxicological effects. The sorption of PFASs, i.e. perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS), perfluorobutanoic acid (PFBA) and perfluorobutansulfonic acid (PFBS), by granular activated carbon (GAC) and softwood-derived biochar was studied. The sorption equilibrium of PFASs on GAC was obtained within 3-24 h, while the time required to reach equilibrium for biochar was 12-48 h. PFASs sorption on both GAC and biochar were well represented by the pseudo-second-order model. In the case of sorption isotherms, the PFAS sorption capacity was chain-length dependent with following order: PFOS > PFOA > PFBS > PFBA. GAC exhibited high maximum Langmuir sorption capacity for both PFOS (123.5 µmol g -1 ) and PFOA (86.2 µmol g -1 ), which were 43% and 39.6% greater than biochar. The maximum sorption capacity for PFBS on GAC (48.3 µmol g -1 ) was higher than that for PFBA (31.4 µmol g -1 ), while the opposite sorption trend was observed for biochar. The sorption mechanisms involved both electrostatic attraction and hydrophobic interaction. The sorption of PFASs increased with the decrease in pH. The competitive sorption of PFASs occurred during the sorption process, resulting in decreased PFASs removal efficiencies. The Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) analyses indicated the presence of a variety of functional groups on the surfaces of adsorbents. So…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09593330.2019.1680744

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, D., He, Q., Wang, M., Zhang, W., & Liang, Y.
Affiliations
  • University at Albany, State University of New York (US)
  • Henan University of Technology (CN)
  • Guangzhou University (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Dongqing
Venue
Environmental Technology
Published
2019-10-30
Volume
42
Issue
12
Pages
1798-1809
ISSN
  • 0959-3330 (ISSN-L)
  • 1479-487X
OpenAlex
W2981038035
Cited by
164
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 4
FWCI
3.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
Keywords
per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, PFAS sorption, granular activated carbon, biochar, perfluorooctanoic acid, PFOS, perfluorobutanoic acid, PFBS, chain length dependence, Langmuir isotherm, pseudo-second-order kinetics, competitive adsorption, pH effect on sorption, electrostatic attraction, hydrophobic interactions, wastewater treatment, adsorption
MeSH terms
Adsorption, Charcoal, Fluorocarbons, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Alkanesulfonic Acids

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review