Cited by 23Microplastics and Plastic PollutionUrban Stormwater Management SolutionsPharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Plastic pollution risks in bioretention systems: a case study

Open access
Mbachu, Oluchi, Kaparaju, Prasad, Pratt, Chris·2023·Environmental Technology

Abstract

We investigated plastic pollution in soil-based stormwater bioretention systems (BRS), which are potentially important pollutant receptors and pathways. Our integrated study is the first of its kind, focusing on plastic abundance, size fractionation, composition, and interactions with urban metrics (including housing density and auxiliary stormwater treatment infrastructure) in BRS filter media. Our results revealed that mesoplastic (MEP) and microplastic (MP) concentrations in BRS are comparable with those reported in other stormwater systems (e.g. wetlands) as well as soils in other land use areas (e.g. agriculture). Distributional sampling within the BRS revealed MP abundances do not change with horizontal distance from the inlet to the outlet. However, MEP abundances drastically decreased towards the outlet, indicating plastic accumulation within BRS. This is important because MEPs can breakdown into MPs which can affect BRS function as well as mobilise downstream. Yet our data uncovered more complex mechanisms involved in BRS plastic fate, with composition data revealing that MPs are not simply breakdown products of MEPs but are instead derived from different sources. Composition, morphology and colour analysis confirmed that BRS polymer liners are a key source of MPs and MEPs in soil filter media. Multivariate analysis of the data with urban design metrics showed gross pollutant traps are effective at decreasing MP concentrations in BRS but not as effective at controlli…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09593330.2022.2034984

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2011.05.030 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1007/s10661-017-6305-8 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.321 · DOI
  4. 10.1021/acs.est.7b06003 · DOI
  5. 10.1080/09593330.2021.1982020 · DOI
  6. 10.1021/acs.est.9b01339 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.05.027 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.watres.2020.116785 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.416 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113335 · DOI
  11. 10.3390/w11071466 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136356 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.mex.2021.101254 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.111657 · DOI
  15. 10.1021/acs.est.7b03055 · DOI
  16. 10.1021/es2031505 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1039/C7AY90016C · DOI
  18. 10.1007/s11356-019-04885-w · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111541 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.watres.2020.116073 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133712 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115390 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146569 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.051 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.229 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/B978-0-12-817880-5.00008-6 · DOI
  27. 10.1126/sciadv.1700782 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.124409 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117352 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.12.013 · DOI
  31. 10.1126/science.1094559 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1098/rstb.2008.0205 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.150 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111421 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145591 · DOI
  36. Allison R, 2006, Gross pollutant and sediment traps
  37. 10.1016/j.watres.2019.06.042 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 23

Metadata

Authors
Mbachu, O., Kaparaju, P., & Pratt, C.
Affiliations
Griffith University (AU)
Corresponding author
Pratt, Chris
Venue
Environmental Technology
Published
2022-02-19
Volume
44
Issue
17
Pages
2525-2538
ISSN
  • 0959-3330 (ISSN-L)
  • 1479-487X
OpenAlex
W4210474550
Cited by
23
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Environmental Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Figshare (cc-by)
Funders
Griffith University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
Keywords
plastic pollution, microplastics, polymer liners, plastic composition, gross pollutant traps, housing density, plastic accumulation, plastic fate
MeSH terms
Microplastics, Environmental Monitoring, Environmental Pollutants, Plastics, Rain, Soil, Water Supply, Water Purification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review