Cited by 40Consumer Packaging Perceptions and TrendsConsumer Market Behavior and PricingConsumer Behavior and Marketing Influence

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Cue utilization to assess food product quality: A comparison of consumers and retailers in India

Chung, Jae-Eun, Pil Yu, Jong, Thorndike Pysarchik, Dawn·2006·The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research

Abstract

Using structural equation modeling, a cue utilization model was developed to compare Indian consumers' use of product cues and retailers' perception on their consumers' cue utilization in evaluating the quality of processed foods. Comparing 307 Indian consumers and 89 food retailers located in rural and urban India, the results reveal that intrinsic cues (taste and freshness) are more important than extrinsic cues (price, packaging, and brand name) in determining Indian consumers' overall quality perceptions of processed food products. The extrinsic cues, on the other hand, were used to evaluate Indian consumers' perceptions of the intrinsic cues. Results from a two-group comparison indicate that Indian food retailers overestimate the importance of price when consumers evaluate overall food quality, and overstate the importance of brand when consumers assess nutrition and freshness in foods, but underestimate the importance of brand when consumers assess taste. Marketing implications are provided.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09593960600572233

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. 2001, Business Line, 24, 6
  2. 2003, MMR, 20, 14
  3. Assael H., 1992, Consumer Behavior and Marketing Action,
  4. Chandran R., 2005, Yahoo India News
  5. Cox D. F., 1967, Risk Taking and Information Handling in Consumer Behavior
  6. 10.1007/BF02723374 · DOI
  7. Davis L. L., 1985, Perceptual and Motor Skills, 61, 671, 10.2466/pms.1985.61.2.671 · DOI
  8. 10.1509/jmkg.65.4.33.18386 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Douglas S., 1983, International Marketing Research
  10. 10.2307/1251524 · DOI
  11. 10.1086/209169 · DOI
  12. 10.1108/EUM0000000004662 · DOI
  13. Lee M., 1995, Journal of Applied Business Research, 12, 21, 10.19030/jabr.v12i1.5833 · DOI
  14. Nevid J. S., 1981, Perceptual and Motor Skills, 53, 407, 10.2466/pms.1981.53.2.407 · DOI
  15. Olson, J. C. 1972. “>Cue utilization in the quality perception process: a cognitive model and an empirical test, Doctoral dissertation”. Lafayette, Indiana: Purdue University.
  16. 10.1086/208859 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Purwar P. C., 1982, The role of price cue in product quality perception: a comprehensive model and an empirical investigation, Doctoral dissertation
  18. Pysarchik D., 1999, Marketing News, 33, 12
  19. Pysarchik D., 1999, Marketing News, 33, 14
  20. 10.1086/209162 · DOI
  21. 10.2307/1251914 · DOI
  22. 10.1177/0266242697154004 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/0148-2963(93)90018-K · DOI
  24. Schellinck D. A., 1980, Determinants of cue choice behavior Doctoral dissertation
  25. 10.1080/09593969200000003 · DOI
  26. 10.1108/09590550410558626 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/0148-2963(90)90019-A · DOI
  28. 2003, GAIN Report #IN9054
  29. 2005, GAIN Report #IN5031

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Chung, J.-E., Pil Yu, J., & Thorndike Pysarchik, D.
Affiliations
Ohio University (US)
Venue
The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research
Published
2006-05
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
199-214
ISSN
  • 0959-3969 (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-4402
OpenAlex
W1977441646
Cited by
40
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The International Review of Retail Distribution and Consumer Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Packaging Perceptions and Trends
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior and Marketing Influence
Keywords
cue utilization, food quality perception, processed foods, intrinsic cues, external cues, price cues, brand cues, taste, freshness, nutrition perception, rural and urban consumers, Indian consumers, food retailers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review