Cited by 2,083Customer Service Quality and LoyaltyConsumer Retail Behavior StudiesConsumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification

Investments in Consumer Relationships: A Cross-Country and Cross-Industry Exploration

De Wulf, Kristof, Odekerken-Schröder, Gaby, Iacobucci, Dawn·2001·Journal of Marketing

Abstract

This research, investigating retailer–consumer relationships, has three distinct intended contributions: (1) It shows that different relationship marketing tactics have a differential impact on consumer perceptions of a retailer's relationship investment; (2) it demonstrates that perceived relationship investment affects relationship quality, ultimately leading to behavioral loyalty; and (3) it reveals that the effect of perceived relationship investment on relationship quality is contingent on a consumer's product category involvement and proneness to engage in retail relationships. The authors empirically cross-validate the underlying conceptual model by studying six consumer samples in a three-country, transatlantic, comparative survey that investigates two industries.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1509/jmkg.65.4.33.18386

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prior conceptualizations of relationship quality typically include satisfaction, trust, and commitment as indicators.

    “Although debate continues about which dimensions constitute relationship quality, prior conceptualizations typically include (relationship) satisfaction, trust, and commitment as indicators (e.g., De Wulf et al. 2001).”
  • Investing time, effort, and other resources creates psychological bonds and cultivates mutual understanding, trust, satisfaction, and commitment.

    “Investing time, effort, and other resources create psychological bonds (De Wulf et al. 2001) and cultivate mutual understanding, trust, satisfaction, and commitment (e.g., Gwinner et al. 1998; Palmatier et al. 2009).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
De Wulf, K., Odekerken-Schröder, G., & Iacobucci, D.
Affiliations
  • Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School and Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University.
  • Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Maastricht University.
  • University of Arizona (US)
Venue
Journal of Marketing
Published
2001-10
Volume
65
Issue
4
Pages
33-50
ISSN
  • 0022-2429 (ISSN-L)
  • 1547-7185
OpenAlex
W2159674550
Cited by
2,083
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 64 · 2022: 95 · 2021: 105 · 2020: 104 · 2019: 95 · 2018: 96 · 2017: 122 · 2016: 124 · 2015: 153 · 2014: 121 · 2013: 151 · 2012: 142
FWCI
45.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Marketing (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
  • Journal of Marketing Communications
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Retail Behavior Studies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
Keywords
consumer-retailer relationships, relationship quality, behavioral loyalty, product category involvement, cross-industry comparison, cross-national comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review