Cited by 17Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationMedical Practices and RehabilitationSpine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology

The McKenzie method and its association with psychosocial outcomes in low back pain: a systematic review

Kuhnow, Alexi, Kuhnow, Jason, Ham, David, Rosedale, Richard·2021·Physiotherapy Theory and Practice

Abstract

Study Design: Systematic Literature Review.Background: The McKenzie Method (MDT) is a comprehensive conservative approach commonly used for the management of low back pain (LBP); however, its association with psychosocial outcomes in this population is less clear.Objectives: Evaluate whether MDT has an association with psychosocial outcomes for individuals with LBP.Methods: The following electronic databases were searched: Medline, Pubmed, Cochrane, CINAHL, Embase and AMED. They were systematically searched from the date of inception to August 2019. Included studies had to have participants experiencing LBP who were over 18 years old, utilize MDT as an assessment or intervention, and report outcomes for at least one psychosocial variable. Three reviewers independently evaluated methodological quality of randomized control trials (RCT) using the PEDro scale and observational studies using the GRACE scale.Results: The initial search resulted in 181 articles to review. After screening abstracts, then full articles, a total of 16 studies were included, 5 of which were RCTs rated 5-8/10 on the PEDro scale. A qualitative review was performed and the studies’ results were synthesized into five main findings: fear-avoidance beliefs, depression symptoms, pain self-efficacy, psychological distress, and return to work (RTW).Conclusions: There is evidence that MDT has an association with improving fear-avoidance beliefs, pain self-efficacy, depression, and psychological distress. These results should be interpreted with caution as further high-quality randomized control trials addressing this topic are necessary due to the varying methodological and statistical constructs of the included studies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09593985.2019.1710881

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kuhnow, A., Kuhnow, J., Ham, D., & Rosedale, R.
Affiliations
  • Nova Scotia Health Authority (CA)
  • Private Practice, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
  • London Health Sciences Centre (CA)
Corresponding author
Rosedale, Richard
Venue
Physiotherapy Theory and Practice
Published
2020-01-07
Volume
37
Issue
12
Pages
1283-1297
ISSN
  • 0959-3985 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5040
OpenAlex
W3000562159
Cited by
17
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physiotherapy Theory and Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Keywords
McKenzie method, low back pain, psychosocial outcomes, fear-avoidance beliefs, depression, pain self-efficacy, psychological distress, return to work, conservative treatment
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Fear, Humans, Low Back Pain, Self Efficacy, Return to Work

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review