Cited by 139Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationMedical Practices and RehabilitationPain Management and Treatment

Psychologically Informed Interventions for Low Back Pain: An Update for Physical Therapists

Nicholas, Michael K., George, Steven Z.·2011·Physical Therapy

Abstract

A central theme of current evidence-based guidelines for managing low back pain is endorsement of the resumption of activities despite the presence of pain. This task can be challenging for both therapists and patients, and there are many essentially psychological obstacles to implementing the guidelines. These obstacles can be overcome by knowing how to recognize potential psychological obstacles and understanding the options for managing psychological obstacles in combination with activity-based interventions. This article is intended to address these tasks by explaining and describing the application of empirically based psychological principles and strategic clinical reasoning. Importantly, the roles of skills in assessment, treatment planning, and communication with patients are identified as essential but feasible skills for physical therapists to acquire with appropriate training.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2522/ptj.20100278

Cites

92 of 92 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Psychologically informed physical therapy programs help physical therapists integrate emotional and cognitive components of care and are advantageous to implementation of interdisciplinary programs.

    “The development of psychologically informed physical therapy (PiPT) programs help physical therapists integrate emotional/cognitive components of care and is advantageous to implementation of interdisciplinary programs.22,29-31”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 93 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nicholas, M. K., & George, S. Z.
Affiliations
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • University of Florida Health (US)
Venue
Physical Therapy
Published
2011-05-01
Volume
91
Issue
5
Pages
765-776
ISSN
  • 0031-9023 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-6724
OpenAlex
W2098866468
Cited by
139
References
93
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 6
FWCI
1.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physical Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
Keywords
low back pain, psychological barriers, activity-based intervention, psychological principles, clinical reasoning, patient communication, treatment planning, physiotherapists, evidence-based recommendations
MeSH terms
Disability Evaluation, Humans, Pain Measurement, Patient Care Planning, Professional-Patient Relations, Psychophysiology, Risk Factors, Health Behavior, Low Back Pain, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Risk Assessment, Disease Management, Recovery of Function, Physical Therapy Modalities, Evidence-Based Practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review