Cited by 129Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologySubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesWorkplace Spirituality and Leadership

Development of a bibliography on religion, spirituality and addictions

Open access
GEPPERT, CYNTHIA, BOGENSCHUTZ, MICHAEL P., MILLER, WILLIAM R.·2007·Drug and Alcohol Review

Abstract

Introduction and Aims. The aim of this study was to develop a comprehensive annotated public‐domain bibliography of the literature on spirituality and addictions to facilitate future research and scholarship. Design and Methods. A search was conducted of all citations listed in the MEDLINE, PsychINFO and ALTA Religion databases covering a period from 1941 to 2004 using the following search terms: substance abuse, substance dependence, addiction, religion, spirituality. A group of experts in the field then classified each citation according to empirically derived categories. Results. A total of 1353 papers met the search parameters and were classified into 10 non‐exclusive categories: (1) attitudes toward spirituality and substance use, (2) commentaries, (3) spiritual practices and development in recovery, (4) spiritual and religion variables in the epidemiology of substance abuse, (5) psychoactive substances and spiritual experiences, (6) religious and spiritual interventions, (7) literature reviews, (8) measurement of spirituality and addictions, (9) 12‐Step spirituality and (10) youth and development. Discussion and Conclusions. The literature is voluminous, but has focused primarily in a few areas. Common findings included an inverse relationship between religiosity and substance use/abuse, reduced use among those practising meditation and protective effects of 12‐Step group involvement during recovery. Although sound instruments are available for measuring spirituality, studies have tended to use simplistic, often single‐item measures. [Geppert C, Bogenschutz MP, Miller WR. Development of a bibliography on religion, spirituality and addictions. Drug Alcohol Rev 2007;26:389–395]

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09595230701373826

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • RS are linked to improved health and health-relevant outcomes among individuals with cardiovascular disease, cancer, and substance abuse.

    “are linked to a number of improved health and health-relevant outcomes among individuals with a variety of conditions such as cardiovascular disease (Chida et al., 2009), cancer (Laubmeier et al., 2004), and substance abuse (Geppert et al., 2007).”
  • Findings were less clear for spirituality.

    “Findings were less clear for spirituality (Geppert et al., 2007; Walton-Moss et al., 2013).”
  • Recent comprehensive reviews concluded that RS consistently negatively predicted substance use, possibly due in part to prohibitions against alcohol and other substance use inherent in some religions.

    “Recent comprehensive reviews concluded that RS consistently negatively predicted substance use, possibly due in part to prohibitions against alcohol and other substance use inherent in some religions (Geppert et al., 2007; Kub & Solari-Twadell, 2013; Walton-Moss et al., 2013; Yeung et al., 2009)”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Sloan HPI. God imagery and emergent spirituality in early recovery from chemical dependency: Ana-Maria Rizzuto and the Alcoholics Anonymous Twelve Steps. Diss Abstr Int Sect A: Human Soc Sci 1999;60:2085.
  2. Schenkluhn H, Geisler M. A longitudinal study of the influence of the Transcendental Meditation program on drug abuse. In: Orne-Johnson DW, Farrow JT, eds. Scientific research on the Transcendental Meditation program: collected papers (vol. 1). West Germany: MERU Press, 1977:544 -55.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
GEPPERT, C., BOGENSCHUTZ, M. P., & MILLER, W. R.
Affiliations
University of New Mexico (US)
Corresponding author
GEPPERT, CYNTHIA
Venue
Drug and Alcohol Review
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-07
Volume
26
Issue
4
Pages
389-395
ISSN
  • 0959-5236 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-3362
OpenAlex
W2137663854
Cited by
129
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 10
FWCI
7.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Drug and Alcohol Review (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (U10DA1533)
  • U.S. National Library of Medicine
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Workplace Spirituality and Leadership
Keywords
spirituality, religion, addiction, substance abuse, religiosity, 12-step programs, spiritual practice, recovery, meditation, religious intervention, spirituality measurement, youth, substance use epidemiology, psychoactive substances
MeSH terms
Bibliographies as Topic, Humans, Religion and Psychology, Self-Help Groups, Databases, Bibliographic, Substance-Related Disorders, Internet, Spirituality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review