Cited by 67Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesAlcohol Consumption and Health EffectsPrimary Care and Health Outcomes

Low detection rates, negative attitudes and the failure to meet the “Health of the Nation” alcohol targets: findings from a national survey of GPs in England and Wales

DEEHAN, ANN, TEMPLETON, LORNA, TAYLOR, COLIN, DRUMMOND, COLIN, STRANG, JOHN·1998·Drug and Alcohol Review

Abstract

The appropriateness of the primary care setting to undertake the health promotional activities needed to meet ‘Health of the Nation’ alcohol targets has been acknowledged in UK government policy and the scientific literature. However, the latest data suggest these targets are not being met. A 20% random sample of all general practitioners in England and Wales were surveyed by postal questionnaire to examine their work in detecting alcohol misuse and their attitudes towards the work. Four mailing waves produced a 44% response rate. GPs had identified a mean of 3.2 patients per month drinking above recommended ‘sensible’ guidelines. These patients were mostly male (73%) and above 40 years of age (45%), with nearly half (45%) already dependent drinkers. Most GPs perceived alcohol misuse patients as a difficult group with whom to work. None the less, over half the respondents believed general practice was an appropriate setting for the detection of the problem. However, most did not feel trained or supported in this area of their work. More emphasis needs to be placed on the valuable contribution GPs can make with the larger number of patients who are drinking regularly above ‘sensible’ levels but not yet suffering adverse affects. Our findings point towards not an unwilling profession, but a profession lacking confidence. The provision of support and basic training are major factors in how GPs perceive alcohol misusers and their own role in this work. Twenty years after the Maudsley Alcohol Pilot Project research it is disappointing that, despite greater recognition by GPs of their potential impact, lack of training and lack of support are still so central to their continued low levels of therapeutic commitment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09595239800187081

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
DEEHAN, A., TEMPLETON, L., TAYLOR, C., DRUMMOND, C., & STRANG, J.
Affiliations
St George's, University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
DEEHAN, ANN
Venue
Drug and Alcohol Review
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1998-09
Volume
17
Issue
3
Pages
249-258
ISSN
  • 0959-5236 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-3362
OpenAlex
W2001408947
Cited by
67
References
24
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Drug and Alcohol Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Keywords
general practitioners, alcohol screening, GP attitudes, alcoholism, alcohol guidelines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review