Cited by 112Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesAlcohol Consumption and Health EffectsHealth Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention

Intervention against Excessive Alcohol Consumption in Primary Health Care: A Survey of GPs' Attitudes and Practices in England 10 Years On

Open access
Wilson, Graeme B., Lock, Catherine A., Heather, Nick, Cassidy, Paul, Christie, Marilyn M., Kaner, Eileen F.S.·2011·Alcohol and Alcoholism

Abstract

AIMS: To ascertain the views of general practitioners (GPs) regarding the prevention and management of alcohol-related problems in practice, together with perceived barriers and incentives for this work; to compare our findings with a comparable survey conducted 10 years earlier. METHODS: In total, 282 (73%) of 419 GPs surveyed in East Midlands, UK, completed a postal questionnaire, measuring practices and attitudes, including the Shortened Alcohol and Alcohol Problems Perception Questionnaire (SAAPPQ). RESULTS: GPs reported lower levels of post-graduate education or training on alcohol-related issues (<4 h for the majority) than in 1999 but not significantly so (P = 0.031). In the last year, GPs had most commonly requested more than 12 blood tests and managed 1-6 patients for alcohol. Reports of these preventive practices were significantly increased from 1999 (P < 0.001). Most felt that problem or dependent drinkers' alcohol issues could be legitimately (88%, 87%) and adequately (78%, 69%) addressed by GPs. However, they had low levels of motivation (42%, 35%), task-related self-esteem (53%, 49%) and job satisfaction (15%, 12%) for this. Busyness (63%) and lack of training (57%) or contractual incentives (48%) were key barriers. Endorsement for government policies on alcohol was very low. CONCLUSION: Among GPs, there still appears to be a gap between actual practice and potential for preventive work relating to alcohol problems; they report little specific training and a lack of support. Translational work on understanding the evidence-base supporting screening and brief intervention could incentivize intervention against excessive drinking and embedding it into everyday primary care practice.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/alcalc/agr067

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In 9 survey studies, the majority of GPs and nurses who received training reported that those programmes lasted less than four hours.

    “In 9 survey studies, the majority of the GPs and nurses who received training reported that those programmes lasted less than four hours [20, 23, 44, 46, 47, 70, 76, 78, 79].”

    From Factors influencing the implementation of screening and brief interventions for alcohol use in primary care practices: a systematic review using the COM-B system and Theoretical Domains Framework (2021) · cites this paper as [23]

    In Results, under “Medical education and training on alcohol,” 52% of surveyed GPs reported less than four hours of training, but that group included 34 who reported no training at all. Excluding those 34 leaves 112 of 248 GPs who received training—less than a majority. This paper surveyed GPs, not nurses; the nine-study count belongs to the citing sentence as a whole. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Alcohol was not a goal priority for GPs because they were too busy, which makes them neglect alcohol issues in favour of other presenting problems.

    “Alcohol was not a goal priority for GPs because they were too busy, which makes them neglect alcohol issues in favour of other presenting problems [23, 47, 78, 83, 92, 105, 106].”

    From Factors influencing the implementation of screening and brief interventions for alcohol use in primary care practices: a systematic review using the COM-B system and Theoretical Domains Framework (2021) · cites this paper as [23]

    The Abstract identifies busyness as a barrier, and the Discussion says GPs may be too busy to intervene and that routine alcohol enquiry is not mainstream. The paper does not establish that GPs prioritize other presenting problems over alcohol issues, or that busyness is the reason for that specific choice. The indexed passages have no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Having these resources and displaying information in the waiting room were reported as facilitators in several studies.

    “Having these resources and displaying information in the waiting room (e.g. posters) were reported as facilitators in several studies [20, 23, 37, 39, 47, 55, 78, 92].”

    From Factors influencing the implementation of screening and brief interventions for alcohol use in primary care practices: a systematic review using the COM-B system and Theoretical Domains Framework (2021) · cites this paper as [23]

    The Results section (Table 4; page not provided) identifies readily available counselling materials and screening questionnaires as perceived incentives for alcohol intervention. Neither that passage nor the additional passages retrieved from our copy report waiting-room information or posters as a facilitator, so that part of the attributed claim is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Data from 6 quantitative and 1 qualitative study indicated that GPs believed in the effectiveness of brief interventions.

    “data from 6 quantitative and 1 qualitative studies point otherwise [23, 64, 70, 73, 86, 106, 110].”

    From Factors influencing the implementation of screening and brief interventions for alcohol use in primary care practices: a systematic review using the COM-B system and Theoretical Domains Framework (2021) · cites this paper as [23]

    The Discussion reports that GPs generally felt they could and should intervene for alcohol problems, and the Results report that most felt able to address them. Neither passage establishes that GPs believed brief interventions were effective; the Introduction says GPs in the earlier survey perceived a lack of effectiveness in counselling patients. The ‘6 quantitative and 1 qualitative’ count describes the citing paper’s group of studies, not this survey alone. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The majority of GPs in 4 of 6 quantitative studies reported feeling comfortable asking about alcohol.

    “Notwithstanding, the majority of the GPs in 4 from a total of 6 quantitative studies reported feeling comfortable asking about alcohol [23, 47, 56, 78, 83, 116].”

    From Factors influencing the implementation of screening and brief interventions for alcohol use in primary care practices: a systematic review using the COM-B system and Theoretical Domains Framework (2021) · cites this paper as [23]

    In Results, ‘Attitudes to working with different types of drinker’ (page unavailable), 88% and 87% of GPs agreed it was legitimate to ask problem and dependent drinkers, respectively, about alcohol consumption. That supports a majority holding a favourable attitude toward asking, but the paper does not report whether they felt comfortable doing so or establish the citing sentence’s ‘4 of 6 studies’ count. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. House of Commons Health Committee Alcohol 2010 Vol. 1 London The Stationery Office
  2. NHS Workforce Review Team Workforce Summary—General Practitioners 2008 London: Centre for Workforce Intelligence

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wilson, G. B., Lock, C. A., Heather, N., Cassidy, P., Christie, M. M., & Kaner, E. F. S.
Affiliations
  • Newcastle University (GB)
  • Northumbria University (GB)
  • University of Leicester (GB)
Corresponding author
Wilson, Graeme B.
Venue
Alcohol and Alcoholism
Published
2011-06-20
Volume
46
Issue
5
Pages
570-577
ISSN
  • 0735-0414 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3502
OpenAlex
W2106632751
Cited by
112
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 5
FWCI
6.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Alcohol and Alcoholism (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Leicester Research Archive (University of Leicester) (submittedVersion)
  • Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University) (submittedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity) (cc-by-nc)
Funders
Economic and Social Research Council (ES/G007470/1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
Keywords
excessive alcohol consumption, alcohol-related problems, general practitioners, primary care, screening and brief intervention, alcohol prevention, barriers to intervention, job satisfaction, alcohol policy
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Alcohol Drinking, Alcoholism, Attitude of Health Personnel, Education, Medical, England, Family Practice, Female, Humans, Job Satisfaction, Male, Middle Aged, Motivation, Primary Health Care, Public Policy, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Concept, General Practitioners

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review