CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 113Traumatic Brain Injury ResearchCognitive Functions and MemoryMedical Practices and Rehabilitation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Awareness typologies, long-term emotional adjustment and psychosocial outcomes following acquired brain injury

Ownsworth, Tamara, Fleming, Jenny, Strong, Jenny, Radel, Michael, Chan, Wilbur, Clare, Linda·2007·Neuropsychological Rehabilitation
DOI 10.1080/09602010600615506
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Previous research suggests considerable heterogeneity within groups of individuals identified as having low self-awareness or good self-awareness following acquired brain injury (ABI). The present study aimed to identify typologies of individuals according to neuropsychological and psychological factors related to awareness deficits and compare emotional adjustment and psychosocial outcomes at the initial assessment and 12-month follow-up. Eighty-four participants with ABI (mean time since injury = 3.9 years) were assessed on the Self-Awareness of Deficits Interview, Awareness Questionnaire, Symptom Expectancy Checklist, Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale, Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale, Sydney Psychosocial Reintegration Scale, and an error self-regulation index. A 12-month follow-up assessment of emotional adjustment and psychosocial outcomes was conducted. A hierarchical cluster analysis distinguished four awareness typologies, namely, "poor self-awareness" (n = 12), "high defensiveness" (n = 13), "high symptom reporting" (n = 15), and "good self-awareness" (n = 44). An overall comparison of outcomes indicated that the poor self-awareness and high symptom reporting typologies experienced poorer outcomes than the high defensiveness and good self-awareness typologies. The findings confirm that there are different awareness typologies and highlight the need to tailor interventions according to the nature of awareness deficits.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09602010600615506

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Keppel , G. 1991 . Design and analysis , Englewood Cliffs, NJ : Prentice-Hall .
  2. Loeb , P. A. 1996 . The Independent Living Scales manual , San Antonio, TX : The Psychological Corporation .
  3. 10.1037/0894-4105.10.3.416 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 113

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Ownsworth, T., Fleming, J., Strong, J., Radel, M., Chan, W., & Clare, L.
Affiliations
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • Prince Charles Hospital (AU)
  • Bangor University (GB)
Corresponding author
Ownsworth, Tamara
ORCID
Venue
Neuropsychological Rehabilitation
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2007-04
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
129-150
ISSN
  • 0960-2011 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0694
DOI
10.1080/09602010600615506
OpenAlex
W1968143753
Cited by
113
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 12
FWCI
2.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuropsychological Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
Keywords
acquired brain injury, self-awareness, emotional adjustment, psychosocial outcomes, symptom reporting, defensiveness, anxiety and depression, social reintegration, long-term outcomes
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Awareness, Brain Injuries, Emotions, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Self-Assessment, Glasgow Coma Scale

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review