Cited by 25Digital Mental Health InterventionsStroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryTelemedicine and Telehealth Implementation

Technology-based interventions for mental health support after stroke: A systematic review of their acceptability and feasibility

Shek, Anthony Chun, Biondi, Andrea, Ballard, Dominic, Wykes, Til, Simblett, Sara Katherine·2021·Neuropsychological Rehabilitation

Abstract

Mental health disturbances are common after stroke and linked to a slower recovery. Current face-to-face treatment options are costly and often inaccessible. Technology advances have made it possible to overcome some of these barriers to deliver technology-based mental health interventions remotely, but we do not know how acceptable and feasible they are. This systematic review aims to provide an examination of the acceptability and feasibility of technology-based mental health interventions provided to stroke patients and evaluate any barriers to their adoption. A total of 13 studies were included investigating interventions targeting non-specific mental health, depression or anxiety. The delivery technologies were: video conferencing, computer programmes, telephones, DVDs, CDs, robot-assisted devices, and personal digital assistants. Rates of refusal to participate were low (7.9-25%). Where satisfaction was reported, this was generally high. Many studies achieved high levels of adherence (up to 89.6%). This was lower for some technologies (e.g., robotic assistive devices). Where dropout occurred, this was for reasons including a decline in health as well as technical difficulties. Overall, the literature displays early evidence of using technology to deliver mental health interventions to patients with stroke. This review has identified factors that the design of future studies should take into consideration.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09602011.2019.1701501

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shek, A. C., Biondi, A., Ballard, D., Wykes, T., & Simblett, S. K.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Shek, Anthony Chun
Venue
Neuropsychological Rehabilitation
Published
2019-12-13
Volume
31
Issue
3
Pages
432-452
ISSN
  • 0960-2011 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0694
OpenAlex
W2998592215
Cited by
25
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuropsychological Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0514-10028)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Keywords
stroke, technology-based interventions, telemedicine, acceptability, feasibility, depression, anxiety, adherence, dropout, videoconferencing, barriers to adoption
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Feasibility Studies, Humans, Mental Health, Technology, Stroke

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review