Cited by 339

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Zephyrs of creative destruction: understanding the management of innovation in construction

Winch, Graham·1998·Building Research & Information

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/096132198369751

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. 10.2307/1924811 · DOI
  2. Bazin M., 1993, Cahiers du CSTB, 2643
  3. Bowley M., 1966, The British Building Industry
  4. Buchanan R. A., 1989, The Engineers: a History of the Engineering Profession in Britain 1750–1914
  5. Campagnac E., 1997, Governance at Work, 86
  6. Chartered Institute of Building, 1995, Time for Real Improvement
  7. Connaughton J., 1995, Innovation in the Cladding Industry
  8. 10.1080/096132197370264 · DOI
  9. 10.2307/1568507 · DOI
  10. Cusack P., 1987, Construction History, 3, 61
  11. 10.1080/096132197370228 · DOI
  12. Gann D., 1992, Construction R & D: Analysis Of Private And Publk Sector Funding of Research and Development in the UK Construction Sector
  13. 10.1016/0142-694X(85)90036-5 · DOI
  14. 10.4324/9780203239216 · DOI
  15. Ive G., 1996, Responding to Latham: the Views of the Construction Team, 37
  16. Law J., 1992, Shaping Technology/ Building Society, 21
  17. Lawrence J. C., 1990, Construction History, 6, 23
  18. Miles J., 1996, Where is the Henry Ford of Future Housing Systems?
  19. 10.1093/icc/4.2.363 · DOI
  20. 10.1080/01446198800000012 · DOI
  21. 10.1080/014461997372999 · DOI
  22. Ota K., 1990, Appraisals of management contractors in the British construction industry MSc thesis - UCL
  23. 10.1080/01446199500000006 · DOI
  24. Quigley J., 1982, Government and Technical Progress, 361
  25. Rasmussen M., Concrete conclusions: report of pilot study of innovation and change in the in-situ concrete industry
  26. 10.1177/0275074012455843 · DOI
  27. Schumpeter J., 1976, Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy
  28. 10.1080/096132197370219 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/0048-7333(93)90034-F · DOI
  30. Thompson F. M. L., 1968, Chartered Surveyors: The Growth of a Profession
  31. Tornatzky L. G., 1990, The Processes of Technological Innovation
  32. Van de Yen A. H., 1986, Management Science, 32, 570
  33. Van de Yen A. H., 1989, Research on the Management of Innovation
  34. von Hippel E., 1988, The Sources of Innovation
  35. Watson G., 1988, The Civils
  36. 10.1080/096132197370255 · DOI
  37. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198288411.001.0001 · DOI
  38. 10.1080/01446199500000002 · DOI
  39. 10.1080/014461998372484 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Winch, G.
Venue
Building Research & Information
Published
1998-09
Volume
26
Issue
5
Pages
268-279
ISSN
  • 0961-3218
  • 1466-4321
Cited by
339
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review