Cited by 9Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsHealth Policy Implementation SciencePsychiatric care and mental health services

Implementing brief Dynamic Interpersonal Therapy (DIT) in a VA Medical Center

Chen, Cory K., Ingenito, Christine P., Kehn, Michelle M., Nehrig, Nicole, Abraham, Karen S.·2019·Journal of Mental Health

Abstract

Background: Given increasing mental health needs in the VA, identifying strategies to deliver new services is critical.Aims: This paper describes the process of navigating provider, patient and systems barriers of an initiative to increase choice, access and quality of psychotherapy at the VA by incorporating an evidence-based short-term, psychodynamic psychotherapy.Methods: Brief Dynamic Interpersonal Therapy (DIT) was selected as a viable model for implementation. Data were gathered on the process of implementation, barriers, Veterans seen, and access to psychodynamic psychotherapy.Results: Nine psychologists and 22 masters level pre-doctoral psychology externs have delivered DIT to 73 Veterans. Veterans referred for psychodynamic psychotherapy annually increased 360%. Furthermore, DIT has become the dominant form of psychodynamic psychotherapy requested of the psychology service representing 70.1% of psychodynamic psychotherapy referrals. Strategies are presented for addressing: (1) provider ability, flexibility and motivation, (2) Veteran perception of relevance, distinctiveness and adaptability to complex presenting issues and (3) administrative support.Conclusions: Implementing an evidence-based short-term psychodynamic treatment option in the VA is feasible. VA mental health providers can be trained in brief psychodynamic psychotherapy and can successfully implement those approaches in VA settings. Finally, psychodynamic treatment approaches may serve as a promising alternative to currently available treatments.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09638237.2017.1340602

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, C. K., Ingenito, C. P., Kehn, M. M., Nehrig, N., & Abraham, K. S.
Affiliations
VA NY Harbor Healthcare System (US)
Corresponding author
Chen, Cory K.
Venue
Journal of Mental Health
Published
2017-07-12
Volume
28
Issue
6
Pages
613-620
ISSN
  • 0963-8237 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0567
OpenAlex
W2735978158
Cited by
9
References
43
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Mental Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
psychodynamic psychotherapy, implementation barriers, veterans, brief psychotherapy, provider training, access to psychotherapy, administrative support
MeSH terms
Veterans Health Services, Adult, Mental Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, United States, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans, Treatment Outcome, Veterans Health, Patient Navigation, Psychotherapy, Psychodynamic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review