Cited by 1,355Health Policy Implementation ScienceHealth Sciences Research and EducationEvaluation and Performance Assessment

Dissemination and Implementation Research in HealthTranslating Science to Practice

Brownson, Ross C., Colditz, Graham A., Proctor, Enola K.·2012·Oxford University Press eBooks

Abstract

Section 1: Background 1. The promise and challenges of dissemination and implementation research (Graham A. Colditz) 2. Developing the terminology for dissemination and implementation research in health (Borsika A. Rabin, Ross C. Brownson) Section 2: Theory and approaches 3. Historical roots of dissemination and implementation science (James W. Dearing, Kerk F. Kee) 4. Comparative effectiveness to accelerate translation: Recommendations for an emerging field of science (Russell E. Glasgow, John F. Steiner) 5. The role of economic evaluation in dissemination and implementation research (Ramesh Raghavan) 6. Designing for dissemination of environmental and policy initiatives and programs for high-risk groups (Neville Owen, Ana Goode, Brianna Fjeldsoe, Takemi Sugiyama, Elizabeth Eakin) 7. The role of organizational processes in dissemination and implementation research (Gregory A. Aarons, Jonathan D. Horowitz, Lauren R. Dlugosz, Mark G. Ehrhart) 8. Viewing dissemination and implementation research through a network lens (Douglas A. Luke) 9. Systems thinking in dissemination and implementation research (Bev J. Holmes, Diane T. Finegood, Barbara L. Riley, Allan Best) 10. Participatory approaches for dissemination and implementation research (Meredith Minkler, Alicia L. Salvatore) 11. Enhancing dissemination through marketing and distribution systems: A vision for public health (Matthew W. Kreuter, Christopher M. Casey, Jay M. Bernhardt) Section 3: Design and analysis 12. Design and analysis of dissemination and implementation research (John Landsverk, C. Hendricks Brown, Patricia Chamberlain, Lawrence Palinkas, Mitsunori Ogihara, Sara Czaja, Jeremy D. Goldhaber-Fiebert, Jennifer A. Rolls Reutz, Sarah McCue Horowitz) 13. Measurement issues in dissemination and implementation research (Enola K. Proctor, Ross C. Brownson) 14. Fidelity and its relationship to implementation effectiveness, adaptation and dissemination (Jennifer D. Allen, Laura A. Linnan, Karen M. Emmons) 15. Furthering dissemination and implementation research: The need for more attention to external validity (Lawrence W. Green, Mona Nasser) 16. Evaluation approaches for dissemination and implementation research (Bridget Gaglio, Russell E. Glasgow) Section 4: Setting- and population-specific dissemination and implementation 17. Community and public health settings (Katherine A. Stamatakis, Cynthia A. Vinson, Jon F. Kerner) 18. Social service delivery settings (Curtis McMillen) 19. Implementation science in health care (Brian S. Mittman) 20. Health dissemination and implementation within schools (Rebekka Lee, Steven Gortmaker) 21. Policy dissemination research (Elizabeth A. Dodson, Ross C. Brownson, Stephen M. Weiss) 22. Dissemination and implementation research in populations with health disparities (Antronette (Toni) Yancey, Beth A. Glenn, LaShawnta Bell-Lewis, Chandra L. Ford) 23. Setting-specific cultural adaptation (Luis H. Zayas, Jennifer L. Bellamy, Enola K. Proctor) 24. The path forward in dissemination and implementation research (Ross C. Brownson, Mariah Dreisinger, Graham A. Colditz, Enola K. Proctor)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199751877.001.0001

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • D&I research explicitly attends to external validity, whereas most randomized efficacy and effectiveness trials mainly emphasize internal validity.

    “Dissemination and implementation research pays explicit (although not exclusive) attention to external validity, in contrast to the main emphasis on internal validity in most randomized efficacy and effectiveness trials (20, 48, 52).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brownson, R. C., Colditz, G. A., & Proctor, E. K.
Venue
Oxford University Press eBooks
Published
2012-03-29
OpenAlex
W276537484
Cited by
1,355
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 64 · 2024: 100 · 2023: 102 · 2022: 122 · 2021: 170 · 2020: 172 · 2019: 120 · 2018: 109 · 2017: 77 · 2016: 62 · 2015: 88 · 2014: 69 · 2013: 68 · 2012: 21
FWCI
107.05
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • Oxford University Press eBooks
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
Keywords
dissemination and implementation research, clinical translation, comparative effectiveness, economic evaluation, organizational processes, systems thinking, participatory approach, fidelity, adaptation, generalizability, evaluation approaches, public health marketing, implementation effectiveness, high-risk groups, health professions education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review