The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Psychosocial adjustment to lower-limb amputation: A review
Abstract
PURPOSE: To review the existing literature on the social and psychological challenges faced by people with an amputation and to provide a detailed analysis of the literature examining psychological adjustment to these challenges across time. METHOD: Existing papers on psychological adjustment to amputation were analysed according to their results, methodology, and conclusions. RESULTS: Although depression and anxiety are relatively high up to 2 years post-amputation, they appear to decline thereafter to general population norms. However, social discomfort and body-image anxiety have also been found among some people with amputations, and these have been associated with increased activity restriction, depression, and anxiety. Factors associated with positive adjustment to limb loss include greater time since amputation, more social support, greater satisfaction with the prosthesis, active coping attempts, an optimistic personality disposition, a lower level of amputation in the case of lower limbs, and lower levels of phantom limb pain and stump pain. CONCLUSION: The majority of studies on adjustment to amputation are cross-sectional in design and have used noncomparable measures. Furthermore, they have neglected to study many important areas of rehabilitation, including immediate reaction to amputation, adjustment during and shortly after the rehabilitation period, and development of a changed sense of self and identity. In order to address these concerns, more longitudinal and qualitative research is called for. We end by outlining the components of a descriptive phased model of the rehabilitation process.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adjusting to disfigurement: processes involved in dealing with being visibly different
Thompson, A., & Kent, G. (2001) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/s0272-7358(00)00056-8 · Cited by 397
Cognitions, coping and social environment predict adjustment to phantom limb pain
Jensen, M. P., Ehde, D. M., Hoffman, A. J., Patterson, D. R., Czerniecki, J. M., & Robinson, L. R. (2002) · Pain · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(01)00390-6 · Cited by 241
Kent, G. (2000) · Psychology, Health & Medicine · doi:10.1080/713690187 · Cited by 123
Cited by
Factors affecting quality of life in lower limb amputees
Sinha, R., van den Heuvel, W. J., & Arokiasamy, P. (2011) · Prosthetics & Orthotics International · doi:10.1177/0309364610397087 · Cited by 369
Health-related quality of life among adults with diverse rare disorders
Bogart, K. R., & Irvin, V. L. (2017) · Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases · doi:10.1186/s13023-017-0730-1 · Cited by 171
Creager, M. A., Matsushita, K., Arya, S., Beckman, J. A., Duval, S., Goodney, P. P., Gutierrez, J. A. T., Kaufman, J. A., Joynt Maddox, K. E., Pollak, A. W., et al. (2021) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000000967 · Cited by 164
Beyond the dichotomy: incarceration dosage and mental health
Porter, L. C., & DeMarco, L. M. (2019) · Criminology · doi:10.1111/1745-9125.12199 · Cited by 122
Disability identity predicts lower anxiety and depression in multiple sclerosis.
Bogart, K. R. (2015) · Rehabilitation Psychology · doi:10.1037/rep0000029 · Cited by 90
Metadata
- Authors
- Horgan, O., & MacLachlan, M.
- Venue
- Disability and Rehabilitation
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2004-07-22
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 14-15
- Pages
- 837-850
- ISSN
- 0963-8288 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-5165
- OpenAlex
- W2054373210
- Cited by
- 584
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 17.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Psychosocial adjustment to lower-limb amputation: A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/09638280410001708869
- The paper
- Horgan, O., & MacLachlan, M. (2004). Psychosocial adjustment to lower-limb amputation: A review. Disability and Rehabilitation. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280410001708869
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.