Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 170

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Post-concussion symptoms after mild traumatic brain injury: influence of demographic factors and injury severity in a 1-year cohort study

Røe, Cecilie, Sveen, Unni, Alvsåker, Kristin, Bautz-Holter, Erik·2009·Disability and Rehabilitation

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the prevalence and variation of post-concussion symptoms within the first year after mild traumatic brain injury (TBI), and explore the association between injury severity, demographic factors and symptoms. METHODS: Prospective study of patients with mild TBI followed up at 3, 6 and 12 months (N= 96 included, n = 52 attending all follow-ups). Sociodemographic factors, injury mechanisms and impact of injury (Glasgow Coma Scale score, Abbreviated Injury Severity Score (AIS), Injury Severity Score) were recorded at inclusion. Symptoms were reported in the Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (RPQ) at the follow-ups. The sumscore of all symptoms in RPQ was calculated for each subject. Scores were also calculated separately for the cognitive, physical and behavioural symptoms. RESULTS: Twenty-nine subjects met the post-concussion syndrome criteria at 3 months, and 22 patients at 6 and 12 months. The cognitive symptoms were more prominent than the physical and behavioural symptoms. The cognitive and physical symptoms were associated with AIS for the head injury at 3 months, but not at 12 months. Considerable individual variability in the symptom pattern was found, and the subjects who attended only the 3-months follow-up reported a lower level of symptoms than those attending all follow-ups. CONCLUSIONS: Persistence of symptoms was a considerable problem even 1 year after the injury, with cognitive symptoms dominating. More severe AIS scores were associated with a higher level of cognitive and physical symptoms at 3 months, but not at later follow-ups. Strategies to prevent and treat these symptoms should be focussed in clinical practice.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09638280802532720

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 170

Metadata

Authors
Røe, C., Sveen, U., Alvsåker, K., & Bautz-Holter, E.
Venue
Disability and Rehabilitation
Published
2009-01
Volume
31
Issue
15
Pages
1235-1243
ISSN
  • 0963-8288 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5165
OpenAlex
W2083593842
Cited by
170
References
5
FWCI
3.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Post-concussion symptoms after mild traumatic brain injury: influence of demographic factors and injury severity in a 1-year cohort study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/09638280802532720
The paper
Røe, C., Sveen, U., Alvsåker, K., & Bautz-Holter, E. (2009). Post-concussion symptoms after mild traumatic brain injury: influence of demographic factors and injury severity in a 1-year cohort study. Disability and Rehabilitation. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280802532720

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.