The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Environmental policy integration: towards an analytical framework
Abstract
Environmental policy integration (EPI) is a key defining feature of sustainable development. Despite the fact that EPI has been the subject of much debate both in academic and policy-making circles, conceptual issues relating to EPI have received relatively little treatment. The conceptual work that has been completed on EPI generally fails to place the concept in an appropriate environmental policy context, and this in turn appears to betray the fact that the concept clearly implies a relatively strong revision of the traditional hierarchy of policy objectives. In this article the authors discuss the origins of the concept and provide conceptual clarification regarding its definition and context. Further, the article derives a simple analytical framework consisting of vertical and horizontal dimensions of EPI, which can serve as a useful point of departure for further empirical work on the implementation of EPI.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sustainable development: A critical review
Lélé, S. M. (1991) · World Development · doi:10.1016/0305-750x(91)90197-p · Cited by 2,202
(1990) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/0024-6301(90)90276-a · Cited by 212
Sustainable Development: Needs, Values, Rights
Redclift, M. (1993) · Environmental Values · doi:10.1177/096327199300200107 · Cited by 195
Towards sustainable development: on the goals of development--and the conditions of sustainability
(1999) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.37-1677 · Cited by 74
The Greening of the EU: The Common Agricultural Policy and the Structural Funds
Lenschow, A. (1999) · Environment and Planning C Government and Policy · doi:10.1068/c170091 · Cited by 59
Lenschow, A. (1997) · Journal of European Public Policy · doi:10.1080/135017697344262 · Cited by 48
Cited by
Policy mixes for sustainability transitions: an extended concept and framework for analysis
Rogge, K. S., & Reichardt, K. (2016) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2016.04.004 · Cited by 1,524
The Politics of the Environment: Ideas, Activism, Policy
Carter, N. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108642163 · Cited by 438
Institutions and policy processes: the means to the ends of adaptation
Dovers, S. R., & Hezri, A. A. (2010) · WIREs Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.29 · Cited by 324
Sustainable development and project stakeholder management: what standards say
Eskerod, P., & Huemann, M. (2013) · International Journal of Managing Projects in Business · doi:10.1108/17538371311291017 · Cited by 289
Building synergies between climate change mitigation and energy poverty alleviation
Ürge-Vorsatz, D., & Tirado Herrero, S. (2012) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2011.11.093 · Cited by 256
Metadata
- Authors
- Lafferty, W., & Hovden, E.
- Venue
- Environmental Politics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2003-09
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1-22
- ISSN
- 0964-4016 (ISSN-L)
- 1743-8934
- OpenAlex
- W2099251215
- Cited by
- 720
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 79.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Environmental policy integration: towards an analytical framework. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/09644010412331308254
- The paper
- Lafferty, W., & Hovden, E. (2003). Environmental policy integration: towards an analytical framework. Environmental Politics. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010412331308254
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.