The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sustainable development and project stakeholder management: what standards say
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to analyze how various approaches to stakeholder management, as well as sustainable development principles, are included in internationally‐used project management standards; and to consider the demands these approaches and principles place on project stakeholder management. Design/methodology/approach: An analytical framework was developed based on stakeholder theory within general management, as well as on sustainability research. Desk research was carried out by applying the analytical framework to three project management standards: ICB, PMBOK and PRINCE2. Findings: The research findings suggest that stakeholder issues are treated superficially in the project management standards, while putting stakeholder management in the context of sustainable development would ask for a paradigm shift in the underpinning values. The current project stakeholder practices represent mainly a management‐of‐stakeholders approach, i.e. making stakeholders comply to project needs, whereas a management‐for‐stakeholders approach may be beneficial. Research limitations/implications: As the analysis is based on document studies of bodies of knowledge, the authors cannot be sure to what extent the standards represent real‐life practices. However, the standards are developed by practitioners agreeing on common practices. Further, they are used to certify project managers worldwide. Therefore, the authors find it safe to claim that the findings are relevant when discussing project management practices. Originality/value: The value of this paper lies in the enrichment of the understanding of project stakeholder management by applying concepts from general stakeholder theory and sustainable development research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st‐century business
Elkington, J. (1998) · Environmental Quality Management · doi:10.1002/tqem.3310080106 · Cited by 5,341
The Limits to Growth: A report for the Club of Rome's Project on the Predicament of Mankind
Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., & Behrens, W. W. (1972) · doi:10.1349/ddlp.1 · Cited by 4,268
Stakeholder Theory: The State of the Art
Parmar, B. L., Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Purnell, L., & de Colle, S. (2010) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520.2010.495581 · Cited by 2,755
Cited by
Sustainable project management through project control in infrastructure projects
Kivilä, J., Martinsuo, M., & Vuorinen, L. (2017) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.02.009 · Cited by 301
Sustainability as a new school of thought in project management
Silvius, G. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.121 · Cited by 196
Projects to create the future: managing projects meets sustainable development
Huemann, M., & Silvius, G. (2017) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.04.014 · Cited by 155
Self-citationThe front-end of projects: a systematic literature review and structuring
Williams, T., Vo, H., Samset, K., & Edkins, A. (2019) · Production Planning & Control · doi:10.1080/09537287.2019.1594429 · Cited by 145
Moving goals and governance in megaprojects
Bourne, M., Bosch-Rekveldt, M., & Pesämaa, O. (2023) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2023.102486 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Eskerod, P., & Huemann, M.
- Venue
- International Journal of Managing Projects in Business
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2013-01-18
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 36-50
- ISSN
- 1753-8378 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1977054109
- Cited by
- 289
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 16.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sustainable development and project stakeholder management: what standards say. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/17538371311291017
- The paper
- Eskerod, P., & Huemann, M. (2013). Sustainable development and project stakeholder management: what standards say. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business. https://doi.org/10.1108/17538371311291017
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.