Impact of stakeholder groups on development of a regional entrepreneurial ecosystem
Abstract
This paper discusses the relationship between the entrepreneurial ecosystem and stakeholder groups involved in sustainable development of regions. Findings from empirical research of Latvian regions brought researchers towards improvement of the entrepreneurial ecosystem model. This paper develops an ecosystem model that assists in the planning and designing of regional sustainable development. Findings from empirical research might help us to identify additional contributions of stakeholder groups for sustainable development of regional entrepreneurial ecosystems. The paper is aimed at improving understanding of entrepreneurial ecosystem structure and suggesting ways for individual companies to exploit the components of entrepreneurial ecosystems. By summarizing the research results, the impact of stakeholder groups involved in the sustainable development of a regional entrepreneurial ecosystem is explained.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is a positive impact of interaction between company-university-government on entrepreneurial development, greater for more developed regions/ecosystems.
“Positive impact of interaction between company-university-government on entrepreneurial development (greater for more developed regions/ ecosystems)”
From Toward an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Research Program (2022) · cites this paper as Erina, & Gaile-Shatrevich, V., Sarkane, E. (2017)
Cites
Moving beyond Dyadic Ties: A Network Theory of Stakeholder Influences
Rowley, T. J. (1997) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1997.9711022107 · Cited by 2,522 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Toward an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Research Program
Wurth, B., Stam, E., & Spigel, B. (2022) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1177/1042258721998948 · Cited by 789 · see citing works
Sustainable entrepreneurial ecosystems: an emerging field of research
Volkmann, C., Fichter, K., Klofsten, M., & Audretsch, D. B. (2021) · Small Business Economics · doi:10.1007/s11187-019-00253-7 · Cited by 311 · see citing works
Building sustainable entrepreneurial ecosystems: A holistic approach
Theodoraki, C., Dana, L.-P., & Caputo, A. (2022) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.11.005 · Cited by 297 · see citing works
- Authors
- Erina, I., Shatrevich, V., & Gaile-Sarkane, E.
- Affiliations
- Riga Technical University, Latvia
- Riga Technical University (LV)
- ORCID
- Shatrevich, Vladimir
- Venue
- European Planning Studies
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2017-03-15
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 755-771
- ISSN
- 0965-4313 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-5944
- OpenAlex
- W2601841216
- Cited by
- 61
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 8.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Planning Studies (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › University-Industry-Government Innovation Models
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Regional Economic Development and Innovation
- Keywords
- entrepreneurial ecosystems, stakeholders, sustainable regional development, regional development planning, ecosystem models, Latvian regions, regional entrepreneurship
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review