Cited by 61Entrepreneurship Studies and InfluencesUniversity-Industry-Government Innovation ModelsRegional Economic Development and Innovation

Impact of stakeholder groups on development of a regional entrepreneurial ecosystem

Erina, Inga, Shatrevich, Vladimir, Gaile-Sarkane, Elina·2017·European Planning Studies

Abstract

This paper discusses the relationship between the entrepreneurial ecosystem and stakeholder groups involved in sustainable development of regions. Findings from empirical research of Latvian regions brought researchers towards improvement of the entrepreneurial ecosystem model. This paper develops an ecosystem model that assists in the planning and designing of regional sustainable development. Findings from empirical research might help us to identify additional contributions of stakeholder groups for sustainable development of regional entrepreneurial ecosystems. The paper is aimed at improving understanding of entrepreneurial ecosystem structure and suggesting ways for individual companies to exploit the components of entrepreneurial ecosystems. By summarizing the research results, the impact of stakeholder groups involved in the sustainable development of a regional entrepreneurial ecosystem is explained.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09654313.2017.1282077

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is a positive impact of interaction between company-university-government on entrepreneurial development, greater for more developed regions/ecosystems.

    “Positive impact of interaction between company-university-government on entrepreneurial development (greater for more developed regions/ ecosystems)”

    From Toward an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Research Program (2022) · cites this paper as Erina, & Gaile-­Shatrevich, V., Sarkane, E. (2017)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Erina, I., Shatrevich, V., & Gaile-Sarkane, E.
Affiliations
  • Riga Technical University, Latvia
  • Riga Technical University (LV)
Venue
European Planning Studies
Published
2017-03-15
Volume
25
Issue
5
Pages
755-771
ISSN
  • 0965-4313 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-5944
OpenAlex
W2601841216
Cited by
61
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 3
FWCI
8.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Planning Studies (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › University-Industry-Government Innovation Models
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Regional Economic Development and Innovation
Keywords
entrepreneurial ecosystems, stakeholders, sustainable regional development, regional development planning, ecosystem models, Latvian regions, regional entrepreneurship

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review